Get new posts by email:

How to Use this Blog

BOOZHOO! We've amassed tons of information and important history on this blog since 2010. If you have a keyword, use the search box below. Also check out the reference section above. If you have a question or need help searching, use the contact form at the bottom of the blog.

We want you to use BOOKSHOP! (the editor will earn a small amount of money or commission. (we thank you) (that is our disclaimer statement)

This is a blog. It is not a peer-reviewed journal, not a sponsored publication... WE DO NOT HAVE ADS or earn MONEY from this website. The ideas, news and thoughts posted are sourced… or written by the editor or contributors.

EMAIL ME: (outlook email is gone)


Thursday, August 12, 2021

Prosecuting crimes at Indian residential schools in Canada poses monumental legal challenges


Students at the Kamloops Indian Residential School were required to embrace Catholic traditions.

Sarah Leamon: Canada's Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act is largely uncharted legal territory

The discovery of three mass burial sites at former residential schools has left the Canadian public reeling. The grim—but sadly unsurprising—news has resulted in calls for action, with a number of Indigenous groups calling for accountability in the form of criminal justice. 

Cowessess Chief Cadmus Delorme has described the unmarked gravesites at the former Marieval Indian Residential School as a “crime scene”, while Federation of Sovereign Indigenous Nations Chief Bobby Cameron described the situation as a “crime against humanity”. The Native Women’s Association of Canada is demanding charges as an essential step toward reconciliation.

Their position is that the criminal charges are not only appropriate, but necessary. It is a concrete, unambiguous position. Seeing it through, though, will be anything but.

The first hurdle on the road to criminal prosecution will be building a case.

Vancouver lawyer Sarah Leamon writes a regular column on
(left) Vancouver lawyer Sarah Leamon writes a regular column on

The discovery of these mass gravesites is not enough on its own. Even when combined with first-hand accounts of the abuse that happened at residential schools, more evidence will likely be required to proceed with a criminal prosecution.

Canadian police have exclusive jurisdiction to investigate crimes and to recommend criminal charges to the government as a result of their findings.  In this case, the RCMP would need to begin an investigation of the burial sites.  This would be an intense exercise that would likely not just involve physically pulling these sites apart, but also examining documents and interviewing witnesses in order to determine what actually happened.

The passage of time, combined with the general unreliability and/or unavailability of supporting  records and documents, could make securing the evidence required tenuous at best.

If enough evidence is uncovered, the next stage would be to lay charges.  However, there will likely be a number of practical complexities associated with doing so.

For example, naming parties to the proceeding could present a significant challenge.

Given the age of these gravesites, it is logical to conclude that many of the individuals responsible are deceased. Living parties to the crime may be difficult to locate. Bringing them within the jurisdiction of our courts could be a near-impossible task.

Given these realities, some have suggested that the entities responsible for the schools—not the individuals who carried out the abuse—should be charged. After all, we know that these so-called schools were run by the Catholic Church and funded by the federal government.

While an incorporated body is a legal person, capable of being criminal charged, this approach is still potentially fraught with difficulty.

Consider that criminal charges in this country are almost always laid by the Crown.  Government-employed lawyers prosecute crimes as agents of the Crown.

If charges were to be laid by the Crown against the federal government, an unprecedented legal quagmire would arise. The government would be prosecuting itself.

Although private prosecutions are technically possible, which would help sidestep this impractical and improbable situation, the circumstances under which they occur is narrow and complicated. Navigating such a prosecution would be exceedingly circuitous, why may explain—at least in part—why they are so exceedingly rare.

Then arises the question with respect to the appropriate legislation. It seems that acts of this nature would be more appropriately prosecuted under the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act than the more commonly used Criminal Code.

This piece of legislation is just 20 years old—a relative baby compared to the Criminal Codeand with very few charges having ever proceeded under it, it is largely unchartered legal territory. 

Moreover, proceedings under this act must only proceed with written personal consent from the attorney general. Obtaining such consent could be a laborious effort.

Finally, like in all criminal proceedings, the standard for a successful prosecution is high. In order to secure a conviction, Crown must prove their case beyond any reasonable doubt. This is the highest legal standard of proof available. It is one that presents challenges to Crown, sometimes even in seemingly straightforward cases.

Underpinning all of these complexities is the government’s extremely poor record when it comes to the treatment of Indigenous people.

Many have pointed out the RCMP’s complicity in the operation of residential schools. Bearing this context in mind, there is a looming concern that any police investigation or government action in relation to this tragedy would be disingenuous at best and dishonest at worst.  

Given the seemingly enormous odds against a domestic prosecution, the International Criminal Court may be a more pragmatic forum for such a proceeding.  

There is no indication that this matter has been referred to this court as of yet.

Sarah Leamon is a criminal defence lawyer. She holds a master of arts in women’s studies from UBC. Follow her on Twitter @SarahLeamonLaw and find her website here. The Georgia Straight publishes opinions like this from the community to encourage constructive debate on important issues.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Please: Share your reaction, your thoughts, and your opinions. Be passionate, be unapologetic. Offensive remarks will not be published. We are getting more and more spam. Comments will be monitored.
Use the comment form at the bottom of this website which is private and sent direct to Trace.

Happy Visitors!

They Took Us Away

They Took Us Away
click image to see more and read more

Blog Archive

Most READ Posts


You are not alone

You are not alone

To Veronica Brown

Veronica, we adult adoptees are thinking of you today and every day. We will be here when you need us. Your journey in the adopted life has begun, nothing can revoke that now, the damage cannot be undone. Be courageous, you have what no adoptee before you has had; a strong group of adult adoptees who know your story, who are behind you and will always be so.

Diane Tells His Name

click photo

60s Scoop Survivors Legal Support


Lost Birds on Al Jazeera Fault Lines

Lost Birds on Al Jazeera Fault Lines
click to read and listen about Trace, Diane, Julie and Suzie


As the single largest unregulated industry in the United States, adoption is viewed as a benevolent action that results in the formation of “forever families.”
The truth is that it is a very lucrative business with a known sales pitch. With profits last estimated at over $1.44 billion dollars a year, mothers who consider adoption for their babies need to be very aware that all of this promotion clouds the facts and only though independent research can they get an accurate account of what life might be like for both them and their child after signing the adoption paperwork.


Original Birth Certificate Map in the USA

Why tribes do not recommend the DNA swab

Rebecca Tallbear entitled: “DNA, Blood, and Racializing the Tribe”, bearing out what I only inferred:

Detailed discussion of the Bering Strait theory and other scientific theories about the population of the modern-day Americas is beyond the scope of this essay. However, it should be noted that Indian people have expressed suspicion that DNA analysis is a tool that scientists will use to support theories about the origins of tribal people that contradict tribal oral histories and origin stories. Perhaps more important,the alternative origin stories of scientists are seen as intending to weaken tribal land and other legal claims (and even diminish a history of colonialism?) that are supported in U.S. federal and tribal law. As genetic evidence has already been used to resolve land conflicts in Asian and Eastern European countries, this is not an unfounded fear.

Google Followers