How to Use this Blog
BOOZHOO! We've amassed tons of information and important history on this blog since 2010. If you have a keyword, use the search box below. Also check out the reference section above. If you have a question or need help searching, use the contact form at the bottom of the blog.
We want you to use BOOKSHOP! (the editor will earn a small amount of money or commission. (we thank you) (that is our disclaimer statement)
This is a blog. It is not a peer-reviewed journal, not a sponsored publication... WE DO NOT HAVE ADS or earn MONEY from this website. The ideas, news and thoughts posted are sourced… or written by the editor or contributors.
EMAIL ME: tracelara@pm.me (outlook email is gone)
ALMOST THREE MILLION VISITORS!
United Nations alerted to human rights violations of #BABYVERONICA case
 |
| Baby Veronica with her father Dusten Brown |
Kristen Carpenter and
Lorie Graham have posted a very compelling and powerful paper about the
Supreme Court’s decision in Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl. It is required
reading for anyone interested in the case, and is destined to be the
definitive paper on the international human rights aspects of the case.
The article is titled
Human Rights to Culture, Family, and Self-Determination: The Case of Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl. Here is the abstract:
The well-being of indigenous children is a subject of
major concern for indigenous peoples and human rights advocates alike.
In 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court decided in Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl
that the Indian Child Welfare Act did not prevent the adoption of a
Cherokee child by a non-Indian couple. This occurred over the objections
of her Cherokee biological father, extended family, and Tribal Nation.
After the decision, Baby Girl’s father and the adoptive couple contested
the matter in a number of proceedings, none of which considered the
child’s best interests as an Indian child. The tribally-appointed
attorney for Baby Girl, as well as the National Indian Child Welfare
Association and National Congress for American Indians, began examining
additional venues for advocacy. Believing that the human rights of Baby
Girl, much like those of other similarly situated indigenous children,
were being violated in contravention of the United Nations Declaration
on Indigenous Peoples Rights, and other instruments of international
law, they asked us to bring the matter to the attention of the United
Nations Special Rapporteur for Indigenous Peoples Rights (“UNSR”). We
prepared a “statement of information” to alert the UNSR of the human
rights violations occurring in the case. With the permission of the
attorneys and organizations involved, this chapter introduces the Baby
Girl case, contextualizes the claims in international human rights law,
and then reproduces the statement of information, and portions of the
UNSR’s subsequent public statement. It concludes with an update on the
Baby Girl case and broader discussion about the potential for using
international law and legal forums to protect the human rights of
indigenous children.
If anyone wishes to read this paper, I have the pdf. Email me: tracedemeyer@yahoo.com
Featured Post
This ascendancy and its accompanying tragedy were exposed in a report written in 1924 by Lakota activist Zitkala-Sa, a.k.a. Gertrude Simmon...
Most READ Posts
-
By Anumita Kaur October 2024 Some of the 200 cultural items that the Wyoming Episcopal Church returned to the Northern Arapaho tribe las...
-
By Trace Hentz 2024: I have read new comments on this case. If you have information, please email me: tracelara@pm.me It will be kept conf...
-
Adoption scandal exposed by muckraking Chinese journalists Bo Gu / NBC News Yang Libing (with his son) holds up a photo of his...
-
Editor NOTE: This is one of our most popular posts so we are reblogging it. If you do know where Michael Schwartz is, please leave a com...
-
Facts About Adoption You Won’t Hear from Adoption Professionals Every November we post accuracy about the effects of adoption on the adopt...
-
Eric Schweig Born: Ray Dean Thrasher on 19 June 1967 Inuvik , Northwest Territories , Canada Occupation Actor/Artisan/...
-
[Birth Mother] First Mother Forum: Adoptive parent shares thoughts on having returned... Received as a comment at the last Baby Veronica p...
-
I have been in touch with Lakota officials to offer information about other tribe's foster care systems - and what is working in India...
-
Here are some links if you are interested in the latest news: ...
-
St. Michaels was a residential school where generations of Indigenous children were abused. https://t.co/4qpnZ89uWf — Ruth H. Robertson (R...
60s Scoop Survivors Legal Support
GO HERE:
https://www.gluckstein.com/sixties-scoop-survivors
ADOPTION TRUTH
As the single largest unregulated industry in the United States, adoption is viewed as a benevolent action that results in the formation of “forever families.”
The truth is that it is a very lucrative business with a known sales pitch. With profits last estimated at over $1.44 billion dollars a year, mothers who consider adoption for their babies need to be very aware that all of this promotion clouds the facts and only though independent research can they get an accurate account of what life might be like for both them and their child after signing the adoption paperwork.
Posts
Does this mean that there is reason to hope that the Capos 'adoption' of Veronica could be overturned and that she could be returned to her REAL father, Dusten Brown? I know there would be a huge uproar that Veronica has already been moved too many times and that she should just stay put until she is eighteen, but to me, she will always belong with her natural father and his (their) extended family no matter what has already happened.
ReplyDeleteThere are two scenarios that could happen: The UN is aware that the United States is in major violation of the Indian Child Welfare Act and that in this one case, Veronica was denied a best interests hearing - which also means the feds could get involved (if there is major public outcry and not just tribes but Americans who voice their concerns about ICWA and this case and the way it was handled.) The second is Nightlight Christian Adoption Agency is investigated for trafficking and playing with people's lives - including Dusten Brown and Veronica his daughter. This paper highlights the UN Charter of Indigenous Peoples Rights - and this case of Baby Veronica is clearly in violation of this.
DeleteTo be clear, I am not a lawyer. This is my opinion.
You know I will never give up hope of Veronica returning to her rightful family and life. I will grasp at any straw that comes along. I appreciate you giving your opinion.
ReplyDelete