SUBSCRIBE

Get new posts by email:

How to Use this Blog

CHANGES to format AGAIN - click older posts!
BOOZHOO! We've amassed tons of information and important history on this blog since 2010. If you have a keyword, use the search box below. Also check out the reference section above. If you have a question or need help searching, use the contact form at the bottom of the blog.

PLEASE follow this website by clicking the button above or subscribe.

We want you to use BOOKSHOP! (the editor will earn a small amount of money or commission. (we thank you) (that is our disclaimer statement)

This is a blog. It is not a peer-reviewed journal, not a sponsored publication... The ideas, news and thoughts posted are sourced… or written by the editor or contributors.

Blogger forced a change to our design so please SCROLL past the posts for lots more information.

Support Info: If you are a Survivor and need emotional support, a national crisis line is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week: Residential School Survivor Support Line: 1-866-925-4419. Additional Health Support Information: Emotional, cultural, and professional support services are also available to Survivors and their families through the Indian Residential Schools Resolution Health Support Program. Services can be accessed on an individual, family, or group basis.” These & regional support phone numbers are found at https://nctr.ca/contact/survivors/ . THANK YOU MEGWETCH for reading

NEED HELP WITH AN ADOPTEE SEARCH? Have questions? Use comment form at the bottom of this website.

email: tracelara@pm.me

SEARCH

Monday, February 24, 2014

The Great Divider: How the Baby Veronica case is the sign



By Trace A. DeMeyer

OK, as promised, I have more thoughts after I went to the hallowed halls of Yale Law School last Friday to hear a review of the Baby Veronica Case - and to hear what NCAI, NARF and the Tribal Supreme Court Law Project at Yale were doing while this major case was going on... and I reported to you yesterday what they said essentially…

There weren't any surprises for me unless you count how these panelists didn't use the time to discuss the genocide that actually occurred prior the passing of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 and the child abductions by social workers and missionaries - nor did they mention human trafficking and the Nightlight Adoption Agency dealings with Maldonado, the birthmother.  They did mention boarding schools.

So, I was truly upset. From what I heard, it appears American Indians are eons behind in civil rights and we can't seem to win a case in the Supreme Court.  I’d heard that warning years prior but this time at Yale was a bit more in my face. This case was about adoption by non-Indians, something I lived myself.

We had Justice Alito writing an opinion that Veronica is 1.2% Indian.  NARF attorney Joel West Williams asked the Yale audience, "Who in America is 1/16 or 3/256th anything?"  Yet we have a judge issuing his opinion by measuring an Indian for their Indian-ness which equates to measuring a child’s blood? This is still happening?

·        JUSTICE ALITO delivered the opinion of the Court:
This case is about a little girl (Baby Girl) who is classified as an Indian because she is 1.2% (3/256) Cherokee. Because Baby Girl is classified in this way, the South Carolina Supreme Court held that certain provisions of the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 required her to be taken, at the age of 27 months, from the only parents she had ever known and handed over to her biological father, who had attempted to relinquish his [**736] parental rights and who had no prior contact with the child. The provisions of the federal statute [*2557] at issue here do not demand this result.
·        Jun 25 2013: Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Alito, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Thomas, and Breyer, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., and Breyer, J., filed concurring opinions. Scalia, J., filed a dissenting opinion. Sotomayor, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Ginsburg and Kagan, JJ., joined, and in which Scalia, J., joined in part. Read more here
·         

I couldn’t sleep ... Dusten Brown never had a chance. He went to Iraq knowing the Capobiancos had his daughter but he had to serve a year and a JAG lawyer took his case.  The puzzle remains why Maldonado mysteriously breaks up with him and severs all communication. Was she punishing her high school sweetheart Dusten by selling his baby or was she manipulated by the adoption agency to take their money?

Then it hit me - keeping America ignorant of Indians, culture, actual history - this all works to take Indian children.  Judgment is easy.  Third World poverty (which we didn’t create) somehow equates to abuse of children.  Add their general ignorance of sovereignty and culture, what it means to be Cherokee or Lakota or Navajo or any tribe - and it means you can't win public opinion polls or cases before the Supreme Court? 

Ignorance about Indians? Exactly!

It's been going on since colonial contact. Please, let's not call them settlers anymore but invaders. America has always been the Great Divider, building its fences, writing its laws, counting on classism and racism to divide us. 

America wins every time when it perpetuates this ignorance of Indians.  Do Indians do a good job of educating others about culture, or what's important to us?  Not really. We're way behind in any civil rights movement.  We've had movies romanticizing us over 100 years and it's hard to kill those "savage" “redskin” stereotypes drilled into all our heads!  

What do Americans know about Indians? Nothing.  Practically zilch.

America's "taking care" of Indians only works to create HATE among Americans who view us as privileged in some way that they are not.  Like why do we even have a law that keeps nice white people from adopting Indian babies? Trust me, ICWA is under attack.

I do know that Indians are way ahead in surviving every broken treaty and then fighting each other over small scraps of power. Some tribes even subscribe to "blood quantum" as if they need to purge their citizen rolls of those who may be too white or too black.

We have Supreme Court Justices using the blood quantum argument and you see that is not entirely their fault (they all went to law school but didn’t even have a course on Indian Law at those Ivy League schools) but it tells me - do not go anywhere near them. They are not even aware of their ignorance.  Dusten Brown didn't have a chance, not in that court.

We Indians shouldn't go anywhere near that court or any court with that level of stupidity. No, you can't tell America they are stupid.

What the panel did say was each and every tribe needs to create and have their own child protection network. I agree since it's pretty evident that you can't trust any non-Indian social worker to go to the reservation and use their mother- father “family unit” example.  Only Indians can decide who the right people are to care for its children.  That person might be an auntie, grandmother or another relative, depending on who in the tribal family is willing and able.

And the panel said we need more American Indian lawyers who become judges - because the way it is now - Indians can’t win.

For many years Vine Deloria and others did try very hard to educate others (with their brilliant books) on the white man’s level, even earning degrees in white man’s colleges like Yale and Harvard, but it all comes down to this:  whites don’t really care.

And if we really think about it, this is a very dangerous situation to be in.


Footnote:  I attended white schools like most everyone else - Really nothing I learned was true or real about Indian culture or history. I learned more sitting at the kitchen table of my friend Ellowyn who is Oglala Lakota, who gave me an education about Indians not written about anywhere.  Then there was my one adoptive aunt (a first-born American) who calls me a liar when I told her there were Indian Boarding Schools, and this was right after I visited Haskell in Kansas. No, Americans are not learning about Indians or the truth of our history. 
The Baby Veronica case is the sign, whether we wish to see it that way or not - but we can no longer ignore the ignorance or the danger surrounding this case.

9 comments:

  1. I have prayed and prayed to God .I know he sees all and knows all ,I asked what would Jesus have said about this: Vengence is mine saith the Lord .The children are his ,no man will ever harm or get near them .The time will come when the doors will be forced open and allthe people set free as in the days of Moses when God gave him the power to part the red sea for the crossing and safety of hos people .This is how God works according to what is written and the dreams he gives to the many to prophesy as these are the days of the new beginning.When a man knows it all a man knows nothing so it was written.On and on his words tell us ,all we need to do is ask and he answers by his written word and dreams (holy)I don't know but I have judged and it says man will judge ,he does so for justice and those that judge for ill reasons not for good.Knowledge and seeking the days when adoption first started was where most start a dispute form the detailed beginning,and in my humble opinion Trace DeMeyer has really got her research right on and God will help give her and others he wants as speakers to get this sealed secret vault but a whole world and a country in measure for the ones not aware as they might think it doesn't concern them ,.This Adoption Industry involves everyone and into everything like shattered glass back in the day went into every where and effected all kinds of things,what a horrible shatter ,like a quake in a way shaking things out of their natural order.God Speed I love all gods good people whom love him back and pray for those that just won't receive his goodness ,guess they forgot their is a devil on the lose from years back causing mayhem.People cause mayhem and break the ten only 10 commandments.This was written for believers and those whom might like to read this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Blessings to you Free and thank you for all your prayers!

      Delete
  2. I hope and pray our prayers are answered sooner than we think .Hoping one day all parents will take care and love their children all over the world as they are our future and deserve their own blood line,thats why people have family trees,no one wins mixed up inside a secret puzzle and those that do the adopting could have adopted sweet animals .Many families have taken care of the mothers little ones if she can't ,not always judging the mothers ,they wanted children then suddenly fate takes it's toll and that's when the mother needs help not harm or no help,this in turn causes their baby to misss their mother automatically up to a toddler and more they cry and miss their parents .A foster care woman told me she had a little girl that cried for 3 months ,and I thought to myself I would cry to in the house of strangers like Baby Veronica ( yet I don't ever wish that or I would cry if she did do that too) Gpd Bless and May she be returned to her loving father.<3

    ReplyDelete
  3. I know from the reports that Maldonado had (at least) two children already, and had lost custody of them to their father, and was obligated to pay them support. So at least part of her motivation in adopting Veronica out was probably to avoid another child-support judgment.

    But wait! you might say. She was engaged to marry! The relationship was apparently going fine!

    Yeah, maybe. And maybe she had met herself a new fella while Dusten was gone. She'd already expressed dissatisfaction with his military lifestyle, apparently, but she had to know that in that smallish town with Dusten's family and their mutual friends *everywhere*, eventually word would get back to him if she messed around, and it'd be over. And then she'd probably lose custody too. If he'd been single when that all came out it would have been one thing, but with them married, all he'd have to do is choose a guardian for Veronica, and he'd have the right to do that, and he'd have a chance of winning the custody battle. Bingo, another child-support bill.

    That's the only possibility that makes sense to me. Even her refusing marriage meant she felt there was a pretty good chance the marriage would not last, and it's cheaper to not get married than to file for divorce, and of course not being married to your baby's dad means any custody dispute will work in your favor in many states. Probably including Oklahoma.

    Especially when you lie on the paperwork and happen not to mention your estranged partner's Native heritage...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Dana for these comments - it's very important to this case to know what Maldondao did and why. Could she be mentally imbalanced? It's possible. I expect that one day we will know the entire truth.
      Did the Nightlight Adoption Agency control this situation (when they gave incorrect information to the Cherokee Nation) or did they tell Maldonado to follow their lead with promises of cash? On both, yes. It's looking that way to me.
      Any father who wants to raise his own child deserves the chance. Dusten did everything he could legally but it was too late and not enough - considering the maneuvering of the Capobiancos and their lawyers and the media campaign.
      When money is exchanged for infants, it's trafficking. They might call it adoption but it's actually producing babies for couples like the Capobiancos to purchase.
      If what I heard at Yale is true, with the shortage of infants available to adopt, Indian Country is the first place they'll go and poverty is reason enough for Nightlight and others to target us.

      Delete
  4. Oh, and I wish it were possible to nullify the Supreme Court decision solely on the basis of Alito misdefining what it takes to be declared a member of the Cherokee Nation. You don't need special classes in Indian law to know this one--the information's available widely. Ancestry on the Dawes Rolls is the main deciding factor, not blood quantum. If Alito couldn't take the time to educate himself on that--a quick chat with any official of the Cherokee Nation would have been sufficient, and they could have pointed him to documentation--then the rest of his reasoning is suspect too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. With the briefs in this case, every Supreme Court Justice had ample opportunity to learn and then rule.

      Delete
    2. And to clarify: Although Veronica's birthmother’s attorney contacted the Cherokee Nation about the birthfather’s Indian status, the request misreported Father’s birth date and misspelled his name. (And they were high school sweethearts so this was on purpose)... Then, on forms that govern the transfer of children between states, Maldonado identified Veronica as Hispanic, not Indian. If her heritage had been reported accurately, Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children staff would have contacted the Cherokee Nation before the infant was allowed to leave Oklahoma.

      Delete
  5. This whole thing about adopting Indian children stinks to high heaven. Stepping out on a limb with this one, "If white people want babies they should have their on and stop victimizing our people with this false sense of concern. It they we so concerned about our people then they should stop stealing our children and pass laws in their US Congress that will restore Indian nations with the lands and resources they systematically stole from us over the centuries." WISHFULL THINKING!!! OK lets get real. Their courts should prosecute them for their dishonest deeds and the crooked adoption agencies as well. MORE WISHFULL THINKING!!!!! So what do we do now? Would love to hear some realistic answers.

    ....and please if you can, leave religion out of this conversation.............THANK YOU!!!!

    ReplyDelete

Please: Share your reaction, your thoughts, and your opinions. Be passionate, be unapologetic. Offensive remarks will not be published. We are getting more and more spam. Comments will be monitored.
Use the comment form at the bottom of this website which is private and sent direct to Trace.


Happy Visitors!

They Took Us Away

They Took Us Away
click image to see more and read more

SIXTIES SCOOP NEWS

Blog Archive

Most READ Posts

Bookshop

Canada's Residential Schools

The religious organizations that operated the schools — the Anglican Church of Canada, Presbyterian Church in Canada, United Church of Canada, Jesuits of English Canada and some Catholic groups — in 2015 expressed regret for the “well-documented” abuses. The Catholic Church has never offered an official apology, something that Trudeau and others have repeatedly called for.

You are not alone

You are not alone

What our Nations are up against!

What our Nations are up against!

To Veronica Brown

Veronica, we adult adoptees are thinking of you today and every day. We will be here when you need us. Your journey in the adopted life has begun, nothing can revoke that now, the damage cannot be undone. Be courageous, you have what no adoptee before you has had; a strong group of adult adoptees who know your story, who are behind you and will always be so.

Did you know?

Did you know?
lakota.cc/16I9p4D

WATCH THIS

Diane Tells His Name


click photo

60s Scoop Survivors Legal Support

GO HERE: https://www.gluckstein.com/sixties-scoop-survivors

Lost Birds on Al Jazeera Fault Lines

Lost Birds on Al Jazeera Fault Lines
click to read and listen about Trace, Diane, Julie and Suzie

ADOPTION TRUTH

As the single largest unregulated industry in the United States, adoption is viewed as a benevolent action that results in the formation of “forever families.”
The truth is that it is a very lucrative business with a known sales pitch. With profits last estimated at over $1.44 billion dollars a year, mothers who consider adoption for their babies need to be very aware that all of this promotion clouds the facts and only though independent research can they get an accurate account of what life might be like for both them and their child after signing the adoption paperwork.

NEW MEMOIR

Original Birth Certificate Map in the USA

Why tribes do not recommend the DNA swab

Rebecca Tallbear entitled: “DNA, Blood, and Racializing the Tribe”, bearing out what I only inferred:

Detailed discussion of the Bering Strait theory and other scientific theories about the population of the modern-day Americas is beyond the scope of this essay. However, it should be noted that Indian people have expressed suspicion that DNA analysis is a tool that scientists will use to support theories about the origins of tribal people that contradict tribal oral histories and origin stories. Perhaps more important,the alternative origin stories of scientists are seen as intending to weaken tribal land and other legal claims (and even diminish a history of colonialism?) that are supported in U.S. federal and tribal law. As genetic evidence has already been used to resolve land conflicts in Asian and Eastern European countries, this is not an unfounded fear.

GOOGLE

In some cases, companies may even take it upon themselves to control the narrative according to their own politics and professed values, with no need for government intervention. For example: Google, the most powerful information company in the world, has been reported to fix its algorithms to promote, demote, and disappear content according to undisclosed internal “fairness” guidelines. This was revealed by a whistleblower named Zach Vorhies in his almost completely ignored book, Google Leaks, and by Project Veritas, in a sting operation against Jen Gennai, Google’s Head of Responsible Innovation. In their benevolent desire to protect us from hate speech and disinformation, Google/YouTube immediately removed the original Project Veritas video from the Internet. - https://desultoryheroics.com/2023/11/12/internet-censorship-everywhere-all-at-once

Google Followers