How to Use this Blog
Howdy! We've amassed tons of information and important history on this blog since 2010. If you have a keyword, use the search box below. Also check out the reference section above. If you have a question or need help searching, use the contact form at the bottom of the blog.
PLEASE follow this website by clicking the button above or subscribe.
We want you to use BOOKSHOP! (the editor will earn a small amount of money or commission. (we thank you) (that is our disclaimer statement)
This is a blog. It is not a peer-reviewed journal, not a sponsored publication... The ideas, news and thoughts posted are sourced… or written by the editor or contributors.
Blogger forced a change to our design so please SCROLL past the posts for lots more information.
Support Info: If you are a Survivor and need emotional support, a national crisis line is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week: Residential School Survivor Support Line: 1-866-925-4419. Additional Health Support Information: Emotional, cultural, and professional support services are also available to Survivors and their families through the Indian Residential Schools Resolution Health Support Program. Services can be accessed on an individual, family, or group basis.” These & regional support phone numbers are found at https://nctr.ca/contact/survivors/ .
THANK YOU MEGWETCH for reading
NEED HELP WITH AN ADOPTEE SEARCH? Have questions? Use comment form at the bottom of this website.
email: tracelara@pm.me
Adopters, Blogging and Privacy for Adoptees
There are many adopters who are blogging about their adopted child. THIS MUST END NOW!
Looming hot issue concerning "privacy" for minor adoptees
By Trace L. Hentz (Blogger- Adoptee) (repost from 2014)
I
am an adoptee, well past the age of majority, and because of my closed
adoption, I had to climb a mountain and claw my way up to discover any
details about who my natural family was. Records were sealed in
Wisconsin. Growing up, I had no medical history. I did not share my
adoptive parents blood or ancestry. Mine, on paper, didn't exist.
Even
recently I told a surgeon I am not sure about most of my birthmom Helen's
medical history, though I do know she died from complications of
diabetes.
I have not stopped thinking about the post I wrote on the LOST DAUGHTERS BLOG that APs need to stop blogging about adoptees.
This is a looming hot issue concerning "privacy" for minor adoptees. At
the MIT adoption conference, I heard it loud and clear. I'm sure many
adoptive parents had not considered the ramifications of blogging about
their children's lives, especially when adoptees are still minors. The
dangers of sharing on social media and blogs are REAL
yet being ignored.
APs are, in my opinion, in essence creating an
"unsafe environment" for their child.*
A toddler cannot consent to
having his or her life experiences documented on public spaces. (I
predict some day some clever lawyer will take this on and attempt to sue
an adoptive parent for publicizing and publishing an adoptee's early
private experiences, albeit from the APs perspective.) (There might
already be stalkings and kidnappings due to the increased use of social
media. You can find anyone with the click of a mouse.) (There was
already one lawyer in CA suing adoption agencies for damaged goods -
when an adoptee is ungrateful or not what the APs expected. This is what
lawyers do!)
If someone must blog, then private
password-protected blogs, shared between family members, is the only way
to protect any child. Parenting blogs are one thing; blogging about the
children you adopt is another.
Many adoptees have
told me and related on social media, much needs to be changed about
"adoption" - ending the lack of access to our own adoption files, having
a copy of our real birth certificate, knowing our ancestry, our medical
history and so much more....including an understanding of birth trauma,
anxiety and stress disorders in adoptees.
My goal as a
writer/adoption author/adoptee is to advocate for adoptees too young to
advocate for themselves. I will do whatever it takes to make this issue
understood from the adoptee perspective. (Add to this I taught blogging
and a course on social media.)
In my foster care training in
Oregon back in the 1990s, there was no mention of protecting a minor
child's privacy but people were not blogging and tweeting and
Facebooking back then!
Yet there was plenty to read about confidentiality
for birthmoms - if they chose not to tell anyone and gave a baby up for
adoption - adoption agencies like Catholic Charities assured them no
one would ever have to find out. The child (like me) would have a new
identity and the records were sealed permanently.
This created a
fantasy I had to deal with and live with as an adult. Until I met my dad
Earl, I had no medical history or ancestry.
So much needs to
change about adoption. It's a complicated mess. For 10+ years, I've done
research on adoption as a topic. I am not a lawyer. More and more is
coming to light that "adoption" is not at all what we thought. Much of
what we read is/was created by the billion dollar adoption industry so
it's their sale pitch, aka propaganda for adoptive parents (APs) and
potential APs.
I am old enough now to advocate for those adoptees who can't. And I will.
If I run into APs and lawyers who get upset with me (or my blog) for voicing my opinion, get in line.
**************************************************************
Here
is a very revealing post from Jason on his blog concerning failed
adoptions and the practice of advertising adopted children you no longer
want: REHOMING:
Children For Sale: Get 'Em While They're Hot
His post
I will end with Von's comment on Adoptive Parents blogging about adoptees: The
full exposure some adopters give to adoptees is seriously wrong and
abusive. Some of you might remember the 'Potty Wars' and the 'Slant Eyes
Fiasco' when adoptive mothers were adamant that their right to write
whatever they wanted trumped the rights of children. Many claim they are
not racist or abusive and that adult adoptees are over-sensitive and
need to get a life, be prayed for or learn to be grateful. They pretend
to pity us for our sad lives and state that their adoptees do not suffer
and will not as we have. They know so little of the trauma of adoption
and do so little to protect those they have adopted from further trauma.
Anything posted is forever available and will undoubtedly be used by
someone somewhere to bully, castigate, abuse etc because that sadly is
the down side of our social media. Anyone who overlooks this is either
naïve, stupid or deliberately abusive.
Most READ Posts
-
By Trace Hentz Back in 2011, I posted a story on this blog about the book SUDDEN FURY and the grizzly murder of Maryland adoptive paren...
-
Editor NOTE: This is one of our most popular posts so we are reblogging it. If you do know where Michael Schwartz is, please leave a com...
-
Using DNA tests, Dean Lerat has created a massive family tree for the Treaty 4 territory in Saskatchewan... By day, Dean Lerat is an RCMP st...
-
Facts About Adoption You Won’t Hear from Adoption Professionals Every November we post accuracy about the effects of adoption on the adopt...
-
Despite Canada’s benevolent veneer, its history is replete with examples of genocidal medical violence inflicted upon Indigenous commu...
-
Eric Schweig Born: Ray Dean Thrasher on 19 June 1967 Inuvik , Northwest Territories , Canada Occupation Actor/Artisan/...
-
I could on for an hour about this but I won't. Fathers have rights and this time, a father got his daughter back af...
-
This incredible interview with Jennifer Lauck, author of FOUND, struck a chord with me. Please read it: http://www.examiner.com/open-ado...
-
Lyncoya was a living argument for the supremacy of the white way of life. Jackson killed Creek people, took Creek land, and raised their ...
Canada's Residential Schools
The religious organizations that operated the schools — the Anglican Church of Canada, Presbyterian Church in Canada, United Church of Canada, Jesuits of English Canada and some Catholic groups —
in 2015 expressed regret for the “well-documented” abuses. The Catholic Church has never offered an official apology, something that Trudeau and others have repeatedly called for.
ADOPTION TRUTH
As the single largest unregulated industry in the United States, adoption is viewed as a benevolent action that results in the formation of “forever families.”
The truth is that it is a very lucrative business with a known sales pitch. With profits last estimated at over $1.44 billion dollars a year, mothers who consider adoption for their babies need to be very aware that all of this promotion clouds the facts and only though independent research can they get an accurate account of what life might be like for both them and their child after signing the adoption paperwork.
Why tribes do not recommend the DNA swab
Rebecca Tallbear entitled: “DNA, Blood, and Racializing the Tribe”, bearing out what I only inferred:
Detailed discussion of the Bering Strait theory and other scientific theories about the population of the modern-day Americas is beyond the scope of this essay. However, it should be noted that Indian people have expressed suspicion that DNA analysis is a tool that scientists will use to support theories about the origins of tribal people that contradict tribal oral histories and origin stories. Perhaps more important,the alternative origin stories of scientists are seen as intending to weaken tribal land and other legal claims (and even diminish a history of colonialism?) that are supported in U.S. federal and tribal law. As genetic evidence has already been used to resolve land conflicts in Asian and Eastern European countries, this is not an unfounded fear.
GOOGLE
In some cases, companies may even take it upon themselves to control the narrative according to their own politics and professed values, with no need for government intervention. For example: Google, the most powerful information company in the world, has been reported to fix its algorithms to promote, demote, and disappear content according to undisclosed internal “fairness” guidelines.
This was revealed by a whistleblower named Zach Vorhies in his almost completely ignored book, Google Leaks, and by Project Veritas, in a sting operation against Jen Gennai, Google’s Head of Responsible Innovation.
In their benevolent desire to protect us from hate speech and disinformation, Google/YouTube immediately removed the original Project Veritas video from the Internet. - https://desultoryheroics.com/2023/11/12/internet-censorship-everywhere-all-at-once
As we consider posting pictures or information about the lives of children on the internet, we must also consider the impact on the children (you are considering only the needs of potential adoptive parents). Does the internet have a right or need to know any information about these children? How might the children be impacted in the future with their personal and private information being shared with any stranger that comes across it?
What baffles me--and endangers children--is when adults think of their needs and fail to reflect on what children need. In this case their is an enormous impact that you are failing to consider.