Mediation deal reached during unexpected hearings in Veronica dispute, but details a mystery
Comment by Renae Arbuckle on The Post and Courier news article
08/16/13 at 09:48 PM
So
sad. Sad that an engaged couple's relationship ended so poorly that the
woman would give away her child to total strangers rather than let the
father have a chance. Sad that she, the adoption agency and the
Capobianco's knew of the father's heritage as stated on the adoption
papers and used deceit to illegally transfer a child from one state to
another to quickly begin the adoption process in a state with a
reputation of taking American Indian children.
Cherokee membership has
nothing to do with blood quantum and they do not receive money for being
native. The Capobianco's gambled on the father's never knowing the
outcome. During the pregnancy, he and his family made several attempts
to reach the birth mother with no success. She instructed the hospital
to place her on a list where her or the baby's presence were unreachable
- like no newspaper announcement of the birth. However, she invited
total strangers to leave the state with her newborn child. Four months
later, as the birth father prepared to leave the country on military
duty, he is approached to sign acceptance of service papers. Our single
service men and women sign many required documents including assigning
custody to the other parent before leaving is standard practice. My own
son had to sign similar documents along with having child support
automatically sent each month electronically. This young birth father
signed a similar document - he thought. When the process server tells
him what he really signed, he began legal proceedings then to gain
custody of his daughter.
Even the Capobianco's signed a court document a
few months later acknowledging his Cherokee heritage. Even Brown's
former wife is speaking favorably that he is a good father and
financially supports their daughter. Not sure where you got your info,
but check again.
Moving forward, the Capobianco's arrival in Tulsa this
week was a big media joke. They setup a press conference the next
morning in an expensive hotel with a new crew and many cameras following
them all day. Anyone can see they're trying to sway public opinion t
their side, but it doing the opposite. To top things off, the "mediator"
they bring is not qualified to use the title! This article doesn't
mention that when he approached the Brown's living quarters, he had a
camera crew with him ready to go. He is creating a documentary on the
whole Baby Veronica ordeal. Although he said he had no intentions of
filming the interview, why did he take a camera crew. Our Cherokee
Nation Martials delivered his note to Mr Brown then escorted him off the
school property.
During the same afternoon, Mr Brown offered them to
visit Veronica, but they refused. Instead they filed yet one more
lawsuit. Oh, and lets not forget their "friend" as announced at the
press conference who is conveniently the president of her own marketing,
PR, and social media firm. Now, is it Ms Munday or the Capobianco's
that have created the media frenzy? None of the news is told from Mr
Brown's side, only the Capobianco's. Who is trying to make Veronica the
media's new toy?
I was glad to see the Brown's not bring the child to
either courthouse today. They are protecting her in her own best
interests. Look at the photo for this article if you don't believe me.
They cannot stay in their own home because of the Capabianco's love
affair with the media. Thank God for a smart Oklahoma judge who put a
gag order on this case today.
Oh, according to Mr Brewster, the trumped
up charge by the SC law enforcement has nothing to do with this
situation. Have you read the law? How can someone steal their own child
when they already have custody? It's all they can come up with.
Lastly,
while the father may not fall under ICWA, the child does. The Cherokee
Nation will always take care of its own and Veronica is a Cherokee
Citizen. I am hopeful that the Capobianco's will realize their gamble
did not pay off. When the SC court sent the child home with her father,
jurisdiction transferred to OK. What right does the SC court to
finalized the adoption of a child that is not nor has been in the
adoptive physical custody for half it's life?
Mr Brown has financially
supported both his children, they formed a relationship, and Veronica is
and has been a very happy child in OK. Leave her be. Someone should
begin investigating the (Nightlight) adoption attorney and soon. He's already started
an illegal adoption of another Oklahoma American Indian child from
Shawnee. This time the birth grandmother and the birth father are on the
same side.
http://www.postandcourier.com/article/20130816/PC16/130819561
Cherokee membership has nothing to do with blood quantum and they do not receive money for being native. The Capobianco's gambled on the father's never knowing the outcome. During the pregnancy, he and his family made several attempts to reach the birth mother with no success. She instructed the hospital to place her on a list where her or the baby's presence were unreachable - like no newspaper announcement of the birth. However, she invited total strangers to leave the state with her newborn child. Four months later, as the birth father prepared to leave the country on military duty, he is approached to sign acceptance of service papers. Our single service men and women sign many required documents including assigning custody to the other parent before leaving is standard practice. My own son had to sign similar documents along with having child support automatically sent each month electronically. This young birth father signed a similar document - he thought. When the process server tells him what he really signed, he began legal proceedings then to gain custody of his daughter.
Even the Capobianco's signed a court document a few months later acknowledging his Cherokee heritage. Even Brown's former wife is speaking favorably that he is a good father and financially supports their daughter. Not sure where you got your info, but check again.
Moving forward, the Capobianco's arrival in Tulsa this week was a big media joke. They setup a press conference the next morning in an expensive hotel with a new crew and many cameras following them all day. Anyone can see they're trying to sway public opinion t their side, but it doing the opposite. To top things off, the "mediator" they bring is not qualified to use the title! This article doesn't mention that when he approached the Brown's living quarters, he had a camera crew with him ready to go. He is creating a documentary on the whole Baby Veronica ordeal. Although he said he had no intentions of filming the interview, why did he take a camera crew. Our Cherokee Nation Martials delivered his note to Mr Brown then escorted him off the school property.
During the same afternoon, Mr Brown offered them to visit Veronica, but they refused. Instead they filed yet one more lawsuit. Oh, and lets not forget their "friend" as announced at the press conference who is conveniently the president of her own marketing, PR, and social media firm. Now, is it Ms Munday or the Capobianco's that have created the media frenzy? None of the news is told from Mr Brown's side, only the Capobianco's. Who is trying to make Veronica the media's new toy?
I was glad to see the Brown's not bring the child to either courthouse today. They are protecting her in her own best interests. Look at the photo for this article if you don't believe me. They cannot stay in their own home because of the Capabianco's love affair with the media. Thank God for a smart Oklahoma judge who put a gag order on this case today.
Oh, according to Mr Brewster, the trumped up charge by the SC law enforcement has nothing to do with this situation. Have you read the law? How can someone steal their own child when they already have custody? It's all they can come up with.
Lastly, while the father may not fall under ICWA, the child does. The Cherokee Nation will always take care of its own and Veronica is a Cherokee Citizen. I am hopeful that the Capobianco's will realize their gamble did not pay off. When the SC court sent the child home with her father, jurisdiction transferred to OK. What right does the SC court to finalized the adoption of a child that is not nor has been in the adoptive physical custody for half it's life?
Mr Brown has financially supported both his children, they formed a relationship, and Veronica is and has been a very happy child in OK. Leave her be. Someone should begin investigating the (Nightlight) adoption attorney and soon. He's already started an illegal adoption of another Oklahoma American Indian child from Shawnee. This time the birth grandmother and the birth father are on the same side.
http://www.postandcourier.com/article/20130816/PC16/130819561