BOOZHOO! We've amassed tons of information and important history on this blog since 2010. If you have a keyword, use the search box below. Also check out the reference section above. If you have a question or need help searching, use the contact form at the bottom of the blog.
We want you to use BOOKSHOP to buy books! (the editor will earn a small amount of money or commission. (we thank you) (that is our disclaimer statement)
This is a blog. It is not a peer-reviewed journal, not a sponsored publication... WE DO NOT HAVE ADS or earn MONEY from this website. The ideas, news and thoughts posted are sourced… or written by the editor or contributors.
EMAIL ME: tracelara@pm.me (outlook email is gone)
WOW!!! THREE MILLION VISITORS!
In the spring or summer of 1890, Lost Bird was born somewhere on the prairies of South
Dakota. Fate took her to Wounded Knee Creek on the Pine Ridge Reservation on Dec. 29,
1890.
On that tragic day, hundreds of Lakota men, women and children died in a confrontation
with U.S. troops and the woman who likely was the child’s mother was among them. But
as she was dying, she and her baby found some scanty shelter from the bitter cold and wind
in the bank of a creek.
Four days after the massacre, a rescue party found the infant, miraculously alive,
protected by the woman’s frozen body.
The infant was passed from one person to another and her sensational story attracted
the attention of powerful white men. Eventually, this living souvenir of Wounded Knee
ended up in the hands of a National Guard general.
Lost Bird was adopted by Gen. Leonard Colby and, without her knowledge or consent, his
suffragist wife, Clara Bewick Colby. The baby’s original name died on the killing
field, along with her chance to grow up in her own culture. She became, literally and
figuratively, Zintkala Nuni, the Lost Bird.
So Lost Bird - Zintka, as her adopted mother called her - ended up the
daughter of a very socially and historically prominent white couple. She had one big
advantage - a mother who came to love her. Though Zintka’s adoption was a
surprise to her, Clara Colby took on the duties of motherhood in addition to her work as a
suffragette activist, lecturer, publisher and writer.
However, Zintka’s childhood was marred by her exposure to racism, possible abuse
from adoptive relatives and the indifference of her father. Poverty entered into the mix
when Gen. Colby abandoned his wife for the child’s nursemaid/governess and failed to
provide adequate support for Clara Colby and Zintka. The increasingly restless child endured miserable stays with relatives and at boarding
schools and became harder and harder for her mother to control.
At age 17, Zintka was sent back to her father and his new wife in Beatrice, Neb. The
result was disastrous. A few months later, Gen. Colby placed his now-pregnant daughter in
a stark and severe reformatory. Her son was stillborn, but the girl remained in the
facility for a year.
Zintka eventually returned to her mother. At one point, she seemed to have found
happiness in marriage, but the relationship disintegrated when she discovered her new
husband had given her syphilis, then incurable. She struggled with the effects of that
illness for the rest of her life.
She had a number a careers during her short life: work with Buffalo Bill’s Wild
West Show, various entertainment and acting jobs, and possibly prostitution. Three times,
she managed to visit South Dakota in search of her roots, but her welcome was cool.
By 1916, Zintka was living in abject poverty. She and her then-husband, who suffered
from illness, were trying to make a living in vaudeville. She had had two more children.
One died, probably that year, and Zintka gave the other to an Indian woman who was better
able to care for him. Later that year, she lost her loving mother, Clara Colby, to
pneumonia.
Eventually, Zintka and her husband gave up vaudeville and moved in with his parents in
Hanford, Calif., in 1918. Zintka fell ill on Feb. 9, 1920, as an influenza epidemic swept
across the nation. On Feb. 14, Valentine’s Day, she died.
Clara Colby tried to raise Zintka as a white girl in an unaccepting society and tried
to erase her unceasing attraction to her Lakota culture. In the end, Zintka was rejected
by both. Lost Bird finally came home in 1991, in an effort spurred in part by author Renee
Sansom Flood, author of "Lost Bird of Wounded Knee: Spirit of the Lakota." Her
grave was found in California and her remains were returned to South Dakota and buried at
the grave site at Wounded Knee. Her tragic story led to the organization of the Lost Bird
Society, which helps Native Americans who were adopted outside their culture find their
roots. Sources: "Lost Bird of Wounded Knee: Spirit of the Lakota" by Renee Sansom
Flood.
https://www.historymuseum.ca/virtual-museum-of-new-france/population/slavery/ The Panis territory The outlined territory shown on
this map represents the region from which originate the majority of
aboriginal slaves known as Panis. It includes the Pawnee, but also other
aboriginal peoples that their enemies enslaved or bartered against
European products.
2017- Canada’s 150th birthday prompted
much looking back at our history. And one of the things Canadians have long
been proud about is our status as the final stop on the Underground Railroad, a
safe refuge for American slaves fleeing bondage.
This is true, and we should be
proud. But let’s not be too proud ― after all, the colonies that became Canada
also had slavery for more than two centuries, ending only 30 years before U.S.
President Abraham Lincoln wrote the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863.
When Britain took over New France,
about 7 per cent of the colony was enslaved, or around 4,000 out of a population of 60,000.
Two-thirds were indigenous slaves, known as Panis, and the other third African,
who cost twice as much and were a status symbol. The British did not set them
free.
“We don’t know about what happened before
the Underground Railroad, which is that indigenous and black Canadians endured
slavery.” —Afua Cooper, historian
Unlike our American cousins, Canada
did not itself end its slavery ― in fact, in 1777 slaves began fleeing Canada for
Vermont, which had just abolished slavery. It took Britain to
finally outlaw the practice across their entire empire in 1834.
There had been a history of First Nations enslaving prisoners of war
prior to colonialism, however they were often exchanged as part of
alliance-making or to replace their own war dead. The Canadian Museum for Human Rights reports that
“unlike Aboriginal peoples, Europeans saw enslaved people less as human
beings and more as property that could be bought and sold. Just as
importantly, Europeans viewed slavery in racial terms, with Aboriginals
and Africans serving and white people ruling as masters.”
In 1492, Columbus sailed the ocean blue. He also played a central role in the European adoption of Indian or Native American slavery.
When we think of slavery in early America, we often think of the
practice of African and African-American chattel slavery. However, that
system of slavery wasn’t the only system of slavery that existed in
North America. Systems of Indian slavery existed too. In fact, Indians
remained enslaved long after the 13th Amendment abolished
African-American slavery in 1865.
Commemorating the 400th anniversary of what the English colonizer John Rolfe described as the “20 and odd Negroes” (a number that was actually closer to 30) has dominated social media and the summer’s newscycle. But there’s an aspect of this commemorative activity that hasn’t received much attention. I refer specifically to the violence that occurred at Point Comfort less than a decade before the slave ship White Lion made anchor in August 1619. On that spot, a bloody event worthy of historical introspection took place: the massacre of the Kikotan Indians. That bloody event is important because it made it possible for the English to take Native lands and build Fort Henry and Fort Charles. The Kikotan massacre prepared the ground for the arrival of the first Africans in Virginia.
The New York Times described the decipherment of the Maya hieroglyphs as “one of the great stories of twentieth century scientific discovery.”
Tragically, this decipherment was only necessary because of a one-man Spanish Inquisition, a deliberate, decades-long campaign by a single Catholic priest to destroy the Mayan language and culture. The priest, Diego de Landa, wiped out all knowledge of the written language, and nearly destroyed the spoken language too.
Diego de Landa’s one-man inquisition perfectly illustrates the power of the Intolerance Meme, an idea that evolved in the Jewish religion a few centuries before the birth of Jesus, and was taken up with a vengeance by Christians in the third and fourth centuries AD.
The Intolerance Meme declares that not only is Yahweh the only god, but in addition, anyone who worships other gods is committing a sin. The Intolerance Meme justifies all sorts of atrocities in Yahweh’s name: Murder, slavery, forced conversion, suppression and destruction of other religions, racism, and many other immoral acts.
This was Diego de Landa’s background when he discovered that many of his Mayan “converts” had actually incorporated the Catholic Yahweh/Jesus/Spirit, along with the various saints and angels, into their own traditional religion. When Landa discovered “idol worship” among some of his converts, he felt that his “children” had turned their backs on him, and his life’s work was a failure.
Being a good Roman Catholic, and a carrier of the Intolerance Meme, Landa was furious – he saw this as a betrayal, and started an inquisition that resulted in torture and death across the Yucatan region. He was determined to wipe out all knowledge of the Mayan religion, and saw the Mayan language and hieroglyphs as a key. Fifty years later, in 1699, Spanish soldiers burned a town that had the last school of scribes who knew the Mayan hieroglyphs. By 1720, not a single person alive knew what the hieroglyphs meant.
The Roman Catholic church’s response? They punished Landa. But not for murder, not for torture, and not for destroying an entire culture’s history. No, none of these things were worthy of the Church’s sanctions. Diego de Landa’s crime was that he carried out an inquisition without authorization.
It took over two hundred years, and an international team of linguists, anthropologists, archeologists, mathematicians, an architect, a few brilliant hobbyists, and one twelve-year-old child prodigy hieroglyphics expert, to undo the damage that Landa caused. Armed with their fierce determination and perseverance, they recovered the written language, bit by bit, word by word, symbol by symbol.
Thanks to this dedicated group, the meaning of almost 90% of the hieroglyphs is now recovered.
As for Landa, he had to spend a few years under house arrest in Spain, contemplating his disobedience and praying. Once he’d done his penance, he was promoted to Bishop of Yucatan, and sent back to Central America where he lived out the remainder of his life.
Special thanks to filmmakers David Lebrun and Amy Halpern-Lebrun, who graciously agreed to be interviewed during my trip to the Red Rock Film Festival in Utah.
We’re counting down 10 of the biggest stories The Chronicle of
Social Change published in 2019. Each day, we’ll connect readers with a
few links to our coverage on a big story from this past year.
Forty-one years ago, Congress approved the Indian
Child Welfare Act (ICWA) after years of painstaking research and
activism revealed that up to 30 percent of all Native American
children had been removed from their parents by state and local
governments, and were often placed into the homes of white families.
ICWA has been challenged in court numerous times, most recently in the 2018 case Brackeen v. Zinke,
which called into question the law’s connection to sovereignty as
opposed to race. This year saw a number of developments in the Brackeen case.
Lead Read
Sending Them Home
looks at the only annual memorial event in the nation that honors
Native children lost to boarding schools and foster care. The founder
and lead organizer of the event, long-time activist Frank LaMere, passed away in June 2019.
Though largely forgotten, some 20-30 thousand Native Americans fought
in the Civil War.
Ely Parker was a Seneca leader who found himself in
the thick of battle at the side of General Ulysses S. Grant. Stand
Waite, a Confederate General and a Cherokee was known for his brilliant
guerilla tactics. Also highlighted is Henry Berry Lowery, who became
known as the Robin Hood of North Carolina. Respected Civil War authors
Thom Hatch and Lawrence Hauptman help reconstruct these stories, along
with descendants like Cherokee Nation member Jay Hanna, whose
great-grandfathers fought for both the Union and the Confederacy.
Together, they reveal a new perspective and the very personal reasons
that drew these Native Americans into the fray.
When
the conservation community talks about the first major federal actions
to preserve land in the United States, we often cite the Yosemite Grant:
Abraham Lincoln’s 1864 decision to cede Yosemite Valley and Mariposa
Grove to the state of California for use as a public park. Lincoln’s
decision set the precedent of the U.S. government setting aside land for
the purpose of preservation that led to the establishment of the first
national park, Yellowstone.
What is often overlooked when celebrating
this event is the violent, forced dispossession in Yosemite Valley
carried out by a California state militia force known as the Mariposa
Battalion fewer than two decades earlier. In 1851, the unit attacked the
villages of the Indigenous Ahwahneechee people living in the valley,
burning their homes and food supplies to force them off the land. After
the attack, the U.S. allowed a few surviving Ahwahneechee to stay on
the land, but only if they agreed to serve as a “cultural attraction”
and weave baskets for visiting tourists.
Yosemite National Park’s name is actually derived from an
Ahwahneechee word shouted by villagers as militia forces attacked and
drove them off the land.
Ironically, the word that eventually became the name of the national
park is derived from an Ahwahneechee word shouted by the villagers
during the Battalion’s attack. Battalion soldiers thought the word
“Yosemeatea”" was a place name, but it was actually the Ahwahneechee
word for “killers.”
Thus, Yosemite National Park is actually named for
the act of genocide committed by European-Americans a few years before
the valley was federally designated as a state park.
While shocking, this example is not unique to Yosemite. It is
emblematic of the fact that the history of parks, forests and other
public lands in the U.S. is interwoven with episodes of great cruelty,
often inflicted on the original and traditional inhabitants of what we
call North America. It reminds us that the legacy of the conservation
movement is complex and often dishonorable. source
A
young girl prays at her bedside at a boarding school. A new book by an
Ojibwe author tells the stories life for American Indian children in
boarding schools designed to purge their language and culture.
Denise Lajimodiere's interest in the Indian boarding school experience began with the stories of her parents.
"Mama
was made to kneel on a broomstick for not speaking English, locked in
closets for not speaking English,” she said. “They would pee their pants
and then the nuns would take them out [of the closet] and beat them for
peeing their pants.”
Lajimodiere is Ojibwe, and a member of the
Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa in North Dakota. She was an educator
for 44 years, working as an elementary school teacher and principal
before ending her career recently as as an associate professor of
educational leadership at North Dakota State University in Fargo.
Her
parents were separated from their families and sent to federal
government-run boarding schools as children. Thousands of Native
children met the same fate during the boarding school era, which
scholars estimate lasted from the late 1800s to well into the middle of
the 20th century.
Denise Lajimodiere's grandfather Benjamin an his sister Martha, circa 1898.
Denise Lajimodiere for MPR NewsThe
children were sent to the schools to be purged of their Native
cultures, languages and spiritual practices — forced to learn
English, and often abused.
The experiences of those children, now
with children and grandchildren of their own, have left a deep scar on
many in the generations that came after them.
“Papa was beaten with a belt. He saw one of his fellow students die from a beating at the school,” she said.
Her
parents rarely talked about their boarding school experience. She only
was able to coax stories from her father in the last years of his life.
“Papa
said, 'I just couldn't learn that language,'“ she said, “so they put
lye soap in his mouth and the kids would get blisters."
Lajimodiere
believed her parents’ boarding school abuse was a reason for the family
dysfunction she grew up with, so she began a decade-long quest to
understand it, interviewing people who went through the experience.
"It's
a journey I had to go on to forgive my dad for the way we were
raised, for his temper, his verbal abuse and for the beatings,” she
said. “So, it was a long journey to understand why my father was the way
he was."
What she found was a trove of stories closely guarded
for decades by those who lived them. She tells those stories in their
own words in her new book, “Stringing Rosaries.” She collected the
stories using strict academic research protocols, but the listening was
intensely personal.
Many
of the former boarding school residents she interviewed prefaced their
stories by telling Lajimodiere, “'I've never told anybody my story. I've
never told my kids. I've never told my grandkids. I had to think about
these stories all my life about what happened to me. I don't want my
kids to have to think about it or know about it,’” she said.
Denise Lajimodiere, author of “Stringing Rosaries.”
Amber Mattson | Courtesy of Dreamcatcher Photography
For most people, Lajimodiere promised anonymity before they would share with her the stories.
She recalls one elderly woman who refused to even let family know she was being interviewed for the book.
"She
became very quiet, even though it was a huge house, and no one was in
the house,” recalled Lajimodiere. “She started whispering about being
sexually abused and she said, 'I don't know why I'm telling you. I have
not told anybody.' Almost every survivor in the book experienced sexual
abuse, or they witnessed it."
Lajimodiere found that, while the
stories people told her were often infused with painful and traumatic
memories, that pain was not universal. Some people recalled their time
at a boarding school fondly. But Lajimodiere says even those people
— who said they preferred the school experience to alcoholism, abuse or
hunger they experienced at home — shared stories of abuse in the
boarding schools.
As she traveled the country doing research on
boarding schools and collecting stories, Lajimodiere said she would
often find herself sitting in her car, sobbing, after an interview.
She
realizes now that she was experiencing the collective intergenerational
trauma of losing language, culture and identity. Her parents both spoke
their native languages, Ojibwe and Cree, before they went to boarding
school.
"My father never spoke Cree again; that was completely
beaten out of him,” said Lajimodiere. “So, now, at my age, I'm trying to
relearn Ojibwe. Ojibwe is the language of our ceremonies — and our
ceremonies have come back very strong."
Lajimodiere
thinks connecting with traditional ceremony and culture is helping
Native Americans across the country recover from the generational impact
of the boarding school era.
She asked people she interviewed what it would take to heal from the trauma they experienced.
“Some
of the people in the book say an apology would be a recognition of what
the government did to us. Others have said, 'Boarding schools destroyed
my childhood; I'll never get that back, so an apology would mean
nothing,’" she said.
“Many of them said [what would be healing
would be] a return to tribal spirituality and to the languages, our
traditions and our ceremonies," she said.
Lajimodiere felt
compelled to share the stories because many who attended boarding
schools in the first half of the 1900s are now elderly and dying.
She's clear that she doesn't want the stories to elicit pity. She wants understanding.
“I
want the world to know that part of why we are the way we are,” she
said, “with high alcoholism, high diabetes and a lot of other health
issues, one of the overarching reasons is the boarding school era.”
I was shocked. It had never occurred to me that anyone would create
false documents to protect birth parents from their own children.
Hearing this information was an emotional low. When I was a child,
adults had bamboozled me into believing that Santa Claus existed—and I
had believed them. My reaction was the same now as it had been then.
Childish stories about Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy, the Easter Bunny,
and a dozen other fairy tale characters living in pumpkins and tree
houses in Never Land seemed harmless at the time, but these stories
offered conclusive proof that adults lied to children to intentionally
deceive them. KEEP READING
"Indian Land Forever": The 50th anniversary of the Alcatraz Island takeover
The 1960s comedian Lenny Bruce once wrote that Native
Americans' worst mistake when Europeans supposedly discovered America
was believing possession really is nine-tenths of the law.
It's now common knowledge that the arrival of European settlers
ushered in centuries of violence and misery for America's First Peoples.
But when Bruce wrote those words, American mythology hadn't yet
accepted that stark reality.
So, it was a wake-up call when, 50 years ago this fall, Native
American activists seized the notorious prison island of Alcatraz in San
Francisco Bay, which had recently been closed by the government. Their
leader, 27-year old Mohawk Richard Oakes, cited an 1868 Indian treaty
that gave natives the rights to abandoned federal land. "We invite the
United States to acknowledge the justice of our claim," he said. keep reading
Calvin
Coolidge and Native American group at White House a year after they
were given the right to vote in the Indian Citizenship Act. The Library of Congress
Do
U.S. citizenship and voting rights go hand and hand? For most of the
country’s history, the answer has been no—just look at the example of
Native voting rights, which weren’t secured in all states until the
1960s. Native Americans couldn’t be U.S. citizens when the country
ratified its Constitution in 1788, and wouldn’t win the right to be for
136 years. When black Americans won citizenship with the 14th Amendment in 1868, the government specifically interpreted the law so it didn’t apply to Native people.
On a cool May day in 1758,
a 10-year girl with red hair and freckles was caring for her neighbor’s
children in rural western Pennsylvania. In a few moments, Mary
Campbell’s life changed forever when Delaware Indians kidnapped her and
absorbed her into their community for the next six years. She became the
first of some 200 known cases of white captives, many of whom became
pawns in an ongoing power struggle that included European powers,
American colonists and indigenous peoples straining to maintain their
population, their land and way of life.
While Mary was ultimately
returned to her white family—and some evidence points to her having
lived happily with her adopted Indian tribe—stories such as hers became a
cautionary tale among white settlers, stoking fear of “savage” Indians
and creating a paranoia that escalated into all-out Indian hating.
A group of Native Americans look at a sailing ship in the bay below them. (Credit: Corbis/Getty Images)
From
the time Europeans arrived on American shores, the frontier—the edge
territory between white man’s civilization and the untamed natural
world—became a shared space of vast, clashing differences that led the
U.S. government to authorize over 1,500 wars, attacks and raids on
Indians, the most of any country in the world against its indigenous
people. By the close of the Indian Wars
in the late 19th century, fewer than 238,000 indigenous people
remained, a sharp decline from the estimated 5 million to 15 million
living in North America when Columbus arrived in 1492.
+
Battle of White Bird Canyon: For the historian in you..there are many interesting narratives about this “first fight of the Nez Perce”; here is one of them.
What started out as a loose pile of beads in Manitoba is generating a discussion on American television about murdered and missing Indigenous women and girls. Mish Daniels, a member of Sagkeeng First Nation in Manitoba, is elated after seeing her elaborate beadwork around the neck of movie star and host of The View Whoopi Goldberg. Daniels nearly lost it when she turned on Monday's episode of The View and noticed Goldberg wearing her handmade red jingle dress dancer medallion."I lost my voice yesterday morning because I was screaming so much," said Daniels, who was raised in Winnipeg and now lives in Selkirk, Man."It's like you're winning the lottery or something, and I just can't believe my little fingers and my work made it to New York City and Whoopi Goldberg and The View."
.@WhoopiGoldberg shares about her necklace representing indigenous women who went missing on the Highway of Tears in British Columbia: “Women need to come together and say none of us should be [going] missing!” https://t.co/f8u2wc159Spic.twitter.com/QCXoti7oNL
Look
at me. I was a warrior on this land where the sun rises, now I come
from where the sun sets. Whose voice was first surrounded on this land –
the red people with bows and arrows. The Great Father says he is good
and kind to us. I can’t see it… – Red Cloud
There
was a time when the land was sacred, and the ancient ones were as one
with it. A time when only the children of the Great Spirit were here to
light their fires in these places with no boundaries…
In
that time, when there were only simple ways, I saw with my heart the
conflicts to come, and whether it was to be for good or bad, what was
certain was that there would be change.
– The Great Spirit
May 26, 1637 - Mystic Massacre - The Mystic massacre took place on May 26, 1637 during the Pequot War, when Connecticut colonists under Captain John Mason and their Narragansett and Mohegan allies set fire to the Pequot Fort near the Mystic River.
They shot anyone who tried to escape the wooden palisade fortress and
killed most of the village in retaliation for previous Pequot attacks. The only Pequot survivors were warriors who had been with their sachemSassacus in a raiding party outside the village.
Estimates of Pequot deaths range from 400 to 700, including women, children, and the elderly.
February 29, 1704 – Deerfield Massacre – A force
comprised of Abenaki, Kanienkehaka, Wyandot and Pocumtuck Indians, led
by a small contingent of French-Canadian militia, sack the town of
Deerfield, Massachusetts, killing 56 civilians and taking dozens more as captives.
March 8, 1782 – Gnadenhutten Massacre – Nearly 100 non-combatant Christian Delaware (Lenape) Indians, mostly women, and children, were killed with hammer blows to the head by Pennsylvania militiamen.
1854-1890 – Sioux Wars – As white settlers moved across the Mississippi River into Minnesota, South Dakota, and Wyoming, the Sioux under Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse resisted to keep their hunting grounds.
1855-1858 – Third Seminole War – Under Chief Billy Bowlegs, the Seminole mounted their final stand against the U.S. in the Florida Everglades. When Bowlegs surrendered; he and others were deported to Indian Territory in Oklahoma.
1855-1856 – Rogue River Wars – In the Rogue River Valley area southern Oregon, conflict between the area Indians and white settlers increased eventually breaking into open warfare.
1860-1865 – California Indian Wars – Numerous
battles and skirmishes against Hupa, Wiyot, Yurok, Tolowa, Nomlaki,
Chimariko, Tsnungwe, Whilkut, Karuk, Wintun and others.
1861-1864 – Navajo Wars – Occurring in Arizona and New Mexico Territories, it ended with the Long Walk of the Navajo.
Did you know there were 1,000 (one thousand!) wars on Indians by the US Army?
America doesn't tell you the truth. It never has. It never will.
Becoming Mary Sully by Philip J. Deloria (University of Washington Press)Author,
Harvard professor, and historian Philip J. Deloria describes the era
captured in the nearly lost art of his great aunt, Mary Sully, as a
“critical moment — sometime in the 1920s, perhaps — when many American
Indian people crafted new and different lives for themselves.” Deloria
writes this characterization as part of an introduction to Becoming Mary Sully
(University of Washington Press), a detailed survey of the extant works
of the Dakota Sioux artist. The book underscores her unique position as
an American Indian Modernist and examines the wider historical context
of her surprising and original work, and the political, social, and
aesthetic forces that shaped it. Emerging from potential obscurity,
Sully’s work deepens cultural perceptions of American Indian
abstraction. —Sarah Rose Sharp via
How Manifest Destiny Stretched the U.S. From Sea to Shining Sea
Of course, there's more to Manifest Destiny than some woman in white
or the encouraging hand of the Almighty. The concept was inextricably
tied into the politics of the time, which were (as now) fueled by
something decidedly unholy: money.
What Lies Behind the Woman in White
America's land-lust was driven, first and foremost, by the
thirst for more wealth for its settlers. But distributing that often
ill-gained bounty was not easy. In a time when the scourge of slavery
already was beginning to rip apart the nation, the issue of how to
divide the newly acquired land — which states-to-be would allow slavery,
and which would not — became a political hot potato.
Declaring the land grabs a divine right seemed, if nothing else,
a nice cover story for expansionists of the time. But even more than
money, politics or religion, Manifest Destiny demonstrated something
else about the mindset of many Americans.
"Implied in the notion of Manifest Destiny is that we know best," says Don Haider-Markel,
the head of the department of political science at the University of
Kansas. "And basically, when we say 'we,' we mean sort of Anglo-Saxon
Protestant, otherwise known as sort of white.
"That's telling Native Americans, that's telling Mexicans,
that's telling Africans we kidnapped and used as slaves that we are
superior. Our way is superior.
"I don't see how you can escape from the notion," Haider-Markel says, "that this is a form of white supremacy."
President James Polk was a champion of Manifest Destiny and built his presidential campaign around the idea.
Public domain
Did People Really Accept the Idea?
Certainly, many people at the time believed in Manifest Destiny;
that God wanted the newcomers to take over the continent, to work the
land, to bring Christianity to the Indians and Mexicans, to be
Biblically fruitful and multiply (as O'Sullivan put it), and, if God
found it within His grace, to grow rich while doing it. Expelling more than 100,000 Native Americans from their homes in the American South,
murdering thousands of others, and taking land from Mexicans was not
simply accepted as a divine American right to these people. It was a
duty.
But not everyone bought into that notion. Not by a long shot. Many saw the idea as little more than a dodge.
"There were people, for example, who thought that the drive to
annex Texas was a ploy to gain more land to create more slave states,
because eastern Texas was suitable for growing cotton," says Harry Watson,
a professor of Southern culture at the University of North Carolina.
"Even then, there were people who were bitterly opposed to slavery and
desperately wanted to abolish it, and the first step to abolishing it
might be to prevent it from growing. They did not want to admit Texas,
they did not want to fight Mexico to get Texas, they did not want
slavery to be allowed to spread. All of this was fought out very
bitterly in Congress."
Still, politicians like President James K. Polk
found it politically and economically favorable to press onward. His
call to annex both Texas and Oregon (which would appeal to both Northern
and Southern states) helped win him the presidency in 1845 over anti-expansionist Henry Clay, even though Polk's drive threatened war with both Great Britain and Mexico.
By the time Polk left office in 1849, Manifest Destiny was all but complete. America, barely 60 years after the U.S. Constitution was ratified, now stretched from sea to shining sea.
An ancient Native matriarchal society was upended by centuries of genocide and colonialism. This resulted in culturally sabotaged and isolated communities that are in a constant struggle to save what remains of their sacred identity. The Lakota women living on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota, are rising up against the forces that continue to suppress them. By preserving and protecting their ancestral values and wisdom, they provide a source of hope to their people.
With exclusive access to the lives of 8 women, ranging in age from 10 to 98 years old, we deliver harrowing testimonials of loss and survival and gain insight into what it is to be a modern Native American. With inclusion of current statistics along with historical accounts, we track how these present day conditions came to be.
The unforgettable voices of these determined women inspire us with their strength, gifting us with ancient insights that speak to our current global environmental and cultural crises. These are the powerfully rich stories of brave women and children living in the poorest county in the United States. In their words, “It’s a prisoner of war camp.”
(excerpts)
The continent’s First Nations people were highly civilized, unscathed by
class rule, and harmoniously connected to the natural environment in
ways that hold critical significance for human and other living things
in our current age of capitalist ecocide...
Predator’s massacre chain ran from Connecticut Captain John Mason’s burning and shooting of hundreds of Pequot villagers near Mystic River in May of 1637 through terrible events like the so-called Battle (massacre) of Bad Axe (1832)
and the Sand Creek Massacre (1864) to the Wounded Knee bloodbath (the
so-called Battle of Wounded Knee) in December of 1891, when the U.S.
Calvary killed 150-300 Lakota men, women, and children on the Pine Ridge
Reservation in South Dakota. The United States’ beloved first
president, George Washington, was known to the Iroquois as “Town Destroyer.”
Endnote
1) The 1832 “Black Hawk War” was a one-sided affair, typical of the
many pitiless mass exterminations committed by supposedly noble
“settlers” seeking to “tame the continent.” As penalty for the warrior
Black Hawk and his followers’ determination to reclaim rich tribal lands
brazenly occupied by whites in northern Illinois, the Sauk and Fox
Indians lost 600 people, including hundreds of woman and children. Just
70 soldiers and “settlers” lost their lives. The conflict culminated in
the so-called Battle of Bad Axe, on the eastern shore of the Mississippi
River, near the present-day community of Victory in southwest
Wisconsin.
Better described as a massacre than a “battle,” this American
military triumph involved U.S. General Henry Atkinson killing every
Indian who tried to run for cover or to flee across the Mississippi
River. On August 1, 1832, Black Hawk’s band reached the Mississippi at
its confluence with the Bad Axe River. What followed was an atrocity,
committed despite the Indians’ repeated attempts at surrender. “While
the Sauk refugees were preparing rafts and canoes, the armed [U.S.]
steamboat Warrior arrived,” historian Kerry Trask recounts,
“whereupon Black Hawk tried to negotiate with its troops under a flag of
truce. The Americans opened fire, killing twenty-three warriors.”
“As we neared them,” one US officer who “served” in the U.S. assault
recalled, “they raised a white flag and endeavored to decoy us, but we
were a little too old for them.”
Hundreds of Sauk and Fox men, women and children were shot, clubbed,
and bayoneted to death on August 2nd. “US soldiers scalped most of the
dead. They cut long strips of flesh from dead and wounded Indians for
use as razor strops.” The slaughter was supported by cannon and rifle
fire from the aptly named Warrior, which picked off tribal members swimming for their lives.
By Major Wakefield’s account, the US troops at Bad Axe “shrank not
from their duty. They all joined in the work of death for death it was.
We were by this time fast getting rid of those demons in human shape…
the Ruler of the Universe, He who takes vengeance on the guilty, did not design those guilty wretches to escape His vengeance…”
The top “demon in human shape” – the old Sauk warrior Black Hawk –
lived six years beyond the “war” that bore his name. He was sent to a
US reservation in Iowa after US President Andrew Jackson – a Trump
favorite and himself a prolific Indian-killer – had Black Hawk paraded
as celebrity war booty – as an exotic “savage” and proof of the United
States’ military’s alleged great prowess in defeating such barbarian
brutes – before gawking crowds in eastern US cities.
At Chicago’s United Center at least 41 times each National Hockey
League season, more than 10,000 U.S. whites wear jerseys emblazoned with
a caricature-like profile image of “chief” Black Hawk, whose people
were obliterated and dispersed so that northern Illinois’s fertile
fields and pastures could be turned into the private property of white
farmers, merchants, and industrialists. Oh, but for the return of the
days when America was great!
Intervening Tribes Press Release (released before the Tribal brief with over 400 tribal signatories):
Majority
of U.S. States, 75 Members of Congress and more than 30 Organizations
File Amicus Briefs in Support of Native American Families and Children
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, 26 states and the District of
Columbia, 75 members of Congress and more than 30 organizations filed
friend-of-the-court briefs before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in
support of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA)
in Brackeen v. Bernhardt. Cherokee Nation Principal Chief
Chuck Hoskin, Jr., Morongo Band of Mission Indians Chairman Robert
Martin, Oneida Nation Chairman Tehassi Hill and Quinault Indian Nation
President Fawn Sharp issued the following statement
regarding the amicus briefs:
“We are thrilled to see that more than half of all states across the
country, 75 members of Congress and dozens of leading organizations are
taking a stand for the best interests of Indian children and families.
This continuous support from across the political
spectrum is a testament to the critical role that ICWA plays in
promoting the stability and security of Indian tribes and families.
Together, we are fighting back against the meritless attacks on ICWA. We
are confident that the Fifth Circuit will again stand
on the side of families and children by upholding the law.”
The Cherokee Nation, Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Oneida Nation and
Quinault Nation are co-defendants in the case, defending the Indian
Child Welfare Act (ICWA) against unwarranted attacks on the law’s
constitutionality.
For more than 40 years, ICWA has provided a process for determining the
best interests of Indian children in the adoption and foster care
systems. The tribes are arguing to defend ICWA alongside the Trump
administration, the U.S. Department of Justice, and
the U.S. Department of Interior. The case will be reheard on
January 22, 2020.
The amicus briefs filed by the following States – Alaska, Arizona,
California, Colorado, Connecticut, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Maine,
Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New
Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania,
Rhode Island, Utah, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin – as well as the
District of Columbia, can be found here.
The amicus briefs from members of Congress can be found here,
and the amicus briefs from leading organizations here.
Amici include organizations and political leaders from across the
country spanning the political spectrum, and the U.S. states are
represented by attorneys general from both the Republican and Democratic
parties. They also include law
professors and Native
women writing in support of ICWA.
In 2017, individual plaintiffs Chad and Jennifer Brackeen, a couple from
Texas, along with the state attorneys general in Texas, Louisiana, and
Indiana, sued the U.S. Department of the Interior and its now-former
Secretary Ryan Zinke to challenge ICWA. The
Morongo, Quinault, Oneida and Cherokee tribes intervened as defendants
in the case, and their recent brief
can be found here.
On August 9, 2019, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reaffirmed that
the Indian Child Welfare Act is constitutional and serves the best
interests of children and families. On October 1, 2019, plaintiffs in Brackeen v. Bernhardt chose to continue their
attacks on Indian children and tribal families and requested an en banc rehearing before the Fifth Circuit, which the court granted.
There is broad, bipartisan support against this misguided attack on a
law that is crucial for protecting the well-being of Indian children and
Indian sovereignty. In addition to states and members of Congress, the
Trump administration has strongly defended
ICWA and its protections for Indian children, explaining that ICWA is
an appropriate exercise of Congress’s authority to legislate in the
field of Indian affairs and does not violate the Tenth Amendment or
equal protection laws.
For additional information on this case and the Indian Child Welfare Act please visit: www.ProtectIndianKids.com
Editor's Note: ICWA is the only thing that can prevent more child trafficking in Indian Country - it happened before and it will happen again.
Here are some links if you are interested in the latest news: ...
Bookshop
You are not alone
To Veronica Brown
Veronica, we adult adoptees are thinking of you today and every day. We will be here when you need us. Your journey in the adopted life has begun, nothing can revoke that now, the damage cannot be undone. Be courageous, you have what no adoptee before you has had; a strong group of adult adoptees who know your story, who are behind you and will always be so.
GO HERE:
https://www.gluckstein.com/sixties-scoop-survivors
Lost Birds on Al Jazeera Fault Lines
click to read and listen about Trace, Diane, Julie and Suzie
We conclude this series & continue the conversation by naming that adoption is genocide. This naming refers to the process of genocide that breaks kinship ties through adoption & other forms of family separation & policing 🧵#NAAM2022#AdoptionIsTraumaAND#AdopteeTwitter#FFY 1/6 pic.twitter.com/46v0mWISZ1
As the single largest unregulated industry in the United States, adoption is viewed as a benevolent action that results in the formation of “forever families.” The truth is that it is a very lucrative business with a known sales pitch. With profits last estimated at over $1.44 billion dollars a year, mothers who consider adoption for their babies need to be very aware that all of this promotion clouds the facts and only though independent research can they get an accurate account of what life might be like for both them and their child after signing the adoption paperwork.