Navajo Nation Seeks to Dismiss Texas’ Challenge to Indian Child Welfare Act
WINDOW ROCK – On April 26, 2018 the Navajo Nation filed its Motion to Intervene and Dismiss with the federal district court in Texas v. Zinke.
The case is a constitutional challenge to the Indian Child Welfare Act
(ICWA) by the states of Texas, Indiana, and Louisiana. It relies on a
Texas state ICWA case concerning the placement of a Navajo child with a
non-native family. In its motions the Nation argues that a decision for
Texas would negatively affect the Nation’s relationship with this child
and numerous Navajo children throughout the country. The Nation asks the
court to dismiss the case because it is not a party, and it cannot be
made a party, due to its sovereign immunity.
ICWA was passed by Congress in 1978 to stop the
mass removal of Indian children from Native families and facilitated
placement of those children with non-Natives. Congress found ICWA to be
necessary because Indian children are the future of their tribes, and so
their removal threatens the very existence of tribes. ICWA provides
tribes and tribal members rights to protect their interests in their
children.
In the Texas case the Nation located a Navajo
family to adopt the Navajo child. However, the non-Native foster parents
refused to allow the removal of the child, filing multiple court
challenges to the placement of the Navajo child with the Navajo family,
including the Texas v. Zinke challenge. The actions by the foster
parents have prevented the Navajo child from growing up in his Navajo
culture, language and community, and has prevented the Nation from
maintaining a vital connection to one of its members.
“The Navajo Nation is committed to the protection of all its children, wherever they may live” commented Navajo Nation President Russell Begaye. “We want all Navajo children to have the opportunity to know their people, their traditions, and their language. As this lawsuit shows, we will continue to fight for them. We want them to know they are not forgotten, no matter where they may live.”
“Our children are the future of the Navajo Nation,” noted Vice-President Jonathan Nez. “They are the ones who will take our elders teachings and pass them down for generations to come. I am disappointed by the actions of the plaintiffs in this case who are attempting to sever the connection between Navajo children and our way of life teachings.”
“Keeping our children with Diné families keeps
our language and culture with our most valuable children” stated Navajo
Nation Council Delegate Nathaniel Brown. “The future of our Nation
depends on our children. They are the ones who will carry on our
traditions and our ways. The actions taken by the foster parents and the
State of Texas have deprived this precious Navajo child of a connection
to his Navajo culture and tribe.”
“ICWA was meant to prevent the exact situation in
this case: the wresting of an Indian child from his people” noted
Attorney General Branch. “ICWA’s entire purpose is to maintain and
preserve the connection between an Indian child and her tribe. This year
is ICWA’s 40th anniversary; we should be celebrating the success of
ICWA, not having to defend ICWA and the basic human right of Navajo
families and communities to remain intact. There should be no question
to our right to remain distinctly Navajo through the passage of our
culture, language, and treaty and sovereign rights to our children.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please: Share your reaction, your thoughts, and your opinions. Be passionate, be unapologetic. Offensive remarks will not be published. We are getting more and more spam. Comments will be monitored.
Use the comment form at the bottom of this website which is private and sent direct to Trace.