Check out the Red Fever website for the upcoming screenings & broadcast dates: redfeverfilm.com
a blog for and by American Indian and First Nations adoptees who are called a STOLEN GENERATION #WhoTellsTheStoryMatters #WhyICWAMatters
Check out the Red Fever website for the upcoming screenings & broadcast dates: redfeverfilm.com
The Tlingit & Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska (Tlingit & Haida) and Washington’s Department of Children, Youth and Families have signed an agreement on how to provide support services to the Tribe’s enrolled members — the first formal partnership between that department and an out-of-state Native nation.
Around 23%, or 1,600, Tlingit & Haida tribal children and youth under 18 live in Washington state. This agreement specifies roles and responsibilities shared by the tribes and the Department of Children, Youth and Families to administer services under the Indian Child Welfare Act, including child protective services, foster care, dependency guardianship, termination of parental rights and adoption proceedings for those children. The department has similar agreements with a number of tribes based in Washington.
The Tlingit & Haida is the largest federally recognized Alaska Native nation, with 22,000 citizens throughout the United States.
In November 2023, the Tlingit & Haida opened an office in Lynnwood with at least 20 staff members to serve more than 8,000 tribal citizens who live in Washington, according to Alaska television station KTOO. These services include tribal court, enrollment and case management of child welfare cases.
https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2023/10/2020-census-dhc-a-aian-population.html
December 10, 2024 (Edmonton, AB) – A class action aiming to hold Canada accountable for the harms it inflicted on Métis and non-status Indian children in the Sixties Scoop is currently before the courts. From December 9-12, the Otipemisiwak Métis Government will participate as an intervener in the summary judgment hearing in Varley et al v. The Attorney General of Canada (“Varley Action”). The Otipemisiwak Métis Government is seeking justice for the many Métis children taken from their parents, families, and communities in this heinous act of cultural genocide.
“This week marks a pivotal moment in our ongoing journey toward justice for Métis Citizens who—through no fault of their own—were victims of Canada’s deliberate efforts to erase their identity as Indigenous people,” said Andrea Sandmaier, President of the Otipemisiwak Métis Government. “While we remain hopeful that the Court will recognize Canada’s responsibility for its actions—taking our children, disrupting our families, and stripping us of our ability to pass down our language, traditions, and culture—we know that true justice extends beyond addressing the harm done to individual victims. Our government is committed to holding Canada accountable for the profound damage inflicted on the Métis Nation within Alberta as a collective. We will continue to work tirelessly to ensure our future generations are rooted in the richness of our Métis heritage.”
Brooke Bramfield, Secretary of Children and Family Services for the Otipemisiwak Métis Government, added, “the Sixties Scoop tore children away from the heart of their Métis identity, leaving scars that continue to affect families and communities today. As a government, we continue to seek accountability as we work to ensure that future generations of Métis children never experience the same erasure of their culture, language, and heritage.”
The Varley Action was brought in the wake of the 2018 Sixties Scoop settlement, which excluded Métis and non-status Indian victims from the compensation Canada promised victims. The summary judgment motion will address whether Canada had a responsibility to protect Métis and non-status Indian children who were taken from their families in the Sixties Scoop, and if Canada had a special obligation to act in the best interests of those children. Canada, for its part, denies responsibility and argues that the victims’ claims are out of time because the limitation period has lapsed.
Family affected by the Missing and Murdered Indigenous People (MMIP) Crisis feel lackluster media coverage influences how cases are perceived by the public and pursued by law enforcement. That’s according to new guidelines released by the federal government this week on best practices for media coverage of MMIP.
The guidelines result from roundtable discussions moderated by Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs Bryan Newland and attended by more than 200 participants, including journalists, survivors, community advocates, and Tribal and federal officials. Among the participants where members of the Not Invisible Act Commission, a 41-person committee tasked with developing recommendations improving intergovernmental collaboration on violent crimes in Indian Country and providing resources for survivors and victims’ families.
Between 2022 and 2023, the Commission held seven in-person listening sessions across Indian Country, plus one virtual session. According to the Commission’s 212-page report, more than 600 individuals attended the hearings. Of those, 260 gave testimony to the NIAC, sharing their expertise, experiences, and recommendations to address and reduce the tragic consequences of the crisis of missing, murdered, and trafficked American Indians and Alaska Natives. Many families and survivors expressed concern at the lack of media coverage or coverage that reinforces long-standing prejudice against Native communities.
The new recommendations encourage journalists to focus on an MMIP humanity rather than any potential criminal background. Also, the guidelines urge media to contextualize cases within the disparities faced by Native communities, wrought by generations of forced assimilation, broken treaty promises, and gross underfunding for health and public safety. Using language such as “crisis” vs. “epidemic” and “at-risk” vs. “vulnerable” is encouraged.
The report also features guidelines for strengthening collaboration between law enforcement and journalists, including designating public information officers to release timely information on MMIP case developments to the media.
The MMIP crisis is characterized by Native American communities experiencing disproportionately high rates of assault, abduction and murder. The crisis dates back decades, underpinned by systemic apathy, jurisdictional confusion, and underfunded law enforcement. There is no nationwide data system for MMIP information, and the actual number of MMIP cases is unknown; however, the Bureau of Indian Affairs estimates there are 4,200 unsolved cases.
LINK: https://nativenewsonline.net/currents/feds-release-media-guidelines-for-reporting-on-mmip-cases
WATCH:
https://archive.org/details/TheIndianSanitariumWillHelpYou
During the 1950s in the USA, a large amount of prescriptive material
appeared in the form of magazines, handbooks, and guidance films,
teaching proper manners and good behavior in a rapidly evolving post-war
society. In this context, the U.S. Department of the Interior
commissioned two short films produced by the Bureau of Indian Affairs in
1952 aimed at teaching young Native Americans how to properly use a
telephone and answer calls.
The political context of the era is key here, as the 1950s represented a
kind of pinnacle in the federal government's assimilationist intentions
about Native American communities, whether it be the attempt to abolish
protected reservation territories or the forced teaching of
Anglo-American values in federal residential schools.
These short films, which at
first seem to resemble the innocuous orientation films of the time in
their format and approach, in fact aim not simply at the acquisition of
new cultural codes, but at the complete rewriting of the most
traditional thought patterns. Analyze
their scenography and purpose in the light of ethnographic and
anthropological data, as specifically relevant to the Navajo culture, as
the students and the examples in the movie are clearly aimed at this
community.
Two short films here:
Telephone Etiquette
Receiving a Telephone Call
We didn't need their help. |
graves of children at Carlisle Indian Industrial School
NOTE: I've been to Carlisle to see what is left of that school. I've been to Jim Thorpe, PA where the Olympic Athlete is still buried. Nothing, no words, no building or a gravesite can bring back the millions and millions who were murdered on this soil... The colonizer's goal of genocide was a success, by also burying the truth...Trace
HARRISBURG, Pa. -- President Joe Biden designated a national monument at a former Native American boarding school in Pennsylvania on Monday to honor the resilience of Indigenous tribes whose children were forced to attend the school and hundreds of similar abusive institutions.
The creation of the Carlisle Federal Indian Boarding School National Monument — announced during a tribal leaders summit at the White House — is intended to confront what Biden referred to as a “dark chapter” in the nation's history.
“We're not about erasing history. We're about recognizing history — the good, the bad and the ugly,” Biden said. “I don't want people forgetting 10, 20, 30, 50 years from now and pretend it didn't happen.”
Thousands of Native children passed through the notorious Carlisle Indian Industrial School between 1879 and 1918, including Olympian Jim Thorpe. They came from dozens of tribes under forced assimilation policies that were meant to erase Native American traditions and “civilize" the children so they would better fit into white society.
It was the first school of its type and became a template for a network of government-backed Native American boarding schools that ultimately expanded to at least 37 states and territories.
“About 7,800 children from more than 140 tribes were sent to Carlisle — stolen from their families, their tribes and their homelands. It was wrong making the Carlisle Indian school a national model,” Biden told the White House summit.
Thorpe's great-grandson, James Thorpe Kossakowski, called Biden's designation an important and “historic” step toward broadening Americans' understanding of the federal government's forced assimilation policy.
“It's very emotional for me to walk around, to look at the area where my great-grandfather had gone through school, where he had met my great-grandmother, where they were married, where he stayed in his dorm room, where he worked out and trained,” Kossakowski, 54, of Elburn, Illinois, said in an interview.
The children were often taken against the will of their parents, and an estimated 187 Native American and Alaska Native children died at the institution in Carlisle, including from tuberculosis and other diseases.
There are ongoing efforts to return the children's remains, which were buried on the school's grounds, to their homelands.
“They represent 50 tribal nations from Alaska to New Mexico to New York and I think that symbolizes how horrific Carlisle was,” said Beth Margaret Wright, a Native American Rights Fund lawyer. She has represented tribes trying to get the Army to return their children's remains and is a member of the Pueblo of Laguna, which has children still buried there.
Carlisle was a model for many other schools that came after it and a huge majority of tribal nations that exist today have stories of their children being sent to Carlisle, Wright said.
In September, the remains of three children who died at Carlisle were disinterred and returned to the Fort Belknap Indian Reservation in Montana.
At least 973 Native American children died at government-funded boarding schools that operated for more than 150 years, according to an Interior Department investigation.
During a dozen public listening sessions over the past several years hosted by the Interior Department, survivors of the schools recalled being beaten, forced to cut their hair and punished for using their native languages.
The forced assimilation policy officially ended with the enactment of the Indian Child Welfare Act in 1978. But the government never fully investigated the boarding school system until the Biden administration.
Biden in October apologized on behalf of the U.S. government for the schools and the policies that supported them.
Interior Secretary Deb Haaland, whose grandparents were taken to boarding schools against their families’ will, said no single action would adequately address the harms caused by the schools. But she said the administration's efforts have made a difference and the new monument would allow the American people to learn more about the government's harmful policies.
“This trauma is not new to Indigenous people, but it is new for many people in our nation," Haaland said in a statement.
The schools, similar institutions and related assimilation programs were funded by a total of $23.3 billion in inflation-adjusted federal spending, officials determined. Religious and private institutions that ran many of the schools received federal money as partners in the assimilation campaign.
Monday's announcement marks the seventh national monument created by Biden, who has also altered or enlarged several others. In 2021, he restored the boundaries of two monuments, Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante, on land in southern Utah that's sacred to tribes after the monuments were shrunk under former President Donald Trump.
The 25-acre site (10 hectares) in central Pennsylvania will be managed by the National Park Service and the U.S. Army. The site is part of the campus of the U.S. Army War College.
For Wright, one of the most powerful places at the Carlisle school are the imprints of since-removed tracks for trains that delivered children there.
“There's no longer train tracks there, but you can see where they might have been and where their children would have arrived for the first time and seen a place so far away and seen a place so horrific,” Wright said.
Native American tribes and conservation groups are pressing for more monument designations before Biden leaves office.
There is a push for universities and museums to return Indigenous remains and sacred belongings with new federal regulations.
The push for museums, universities, and federal agencies to return Indigenous remains and sacred belongings is getting stronger as federal regulations have further tightened the rules around how these items can be displayed, giving more legal power to Indigenous tribes.
The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) is a federal law created in 1990. It states that organizations that receive federal funding and possess remains of ancestors and sacred belongings must catalog, identify, and repatriate or return them to their rightful and ancestral owners.
"Anyone can imagine how they would feel if their relatives were being held in an institution and their bones were being pulverized due to radio-carbon testing," Ray Halbritter, the leader of the Oneida Indian Nation in New York, said.
Since its implementation more than thirty years ago, repatriation has been slow-moving. But thanks to tightening restrictions implemented in January, tribes have more legal power to stop the display of ancestors or sacred belongings without their approval. This forced museums across the country to adjust their exhibits to stay in compliance.
It also gave more power to Indigenous communities in identifying ancestors and set a five-year deadline for museums, universities, and federal agencies to definitively identify remains and update inventories.
"Out of an abundance of caution, we decided to de-install or remove a rattle that might have specific meaning in ceremonial context," said Dr. Dirk Van Tuerenhout, the curator of anthropology at the Houston Museum of Natural Science.
Dr. Van Tuerenhout says a pair of woven sandals were also removed out of caution, leaving an open space in the middle of the display.
HMNS' John P. McGovern Hall of The Americas explores Indigenous peoples' diverse and dense history from the Arctic to South America.
According to data from ABC News' owned & operated station WLS in Chicago, there are currently 496 museums or federal agencies across the country that have possession of 90,169 ancestral remains and 708, 279 associated funerary objects that are still pending identification and are not available for repatriation.
"We know that museums, agencies, and universities have identified 128-thousand ancestral remains in their collections," said Maggie Green, data journalist at WLS.
According to data gathered from the Federal Register by Green, these are the Houston-area entities with an inventory: Houston Museum of Natural Science with 26 ancestors, Rice University with five ancestors and 11 funerary objects, and the Army Corps of Engineers - Galveston District with 13 ancestors and 24 funerary items.
The National Park Service defines funerary object as any object reasonably believed to have been placed intentionally with or near human remains.
Dr. Van Tuerenhout estimates the museum currently possesses at least 70 ancestors and sacred belongings - explaining that in the years since their initial NAGPRA review was completed, their staff has discovered additional remains that they are working to return.
ABC13 reached out to Rice University regarding the status of the items listed in the Federal Register, which states the 11 funerary belongings in their possession are currently missing and the university is seeking to find them.
This is the university's response: "Last year, in compliance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, Rice returned the human remains of five Native American individuals to the Tonkawa Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma. Concerning the artifacts referenced in the National Archives and Records Administration Federal Register, we have no record of ever possessing these items."
When explicitly asked about the status of the missing items, the university said it could not provide further details.
As for the Army Corps of Engineers - Galveston District, ABC13 made multiple attempts to get a response and has yet to hear back.
Regarding the process of identification, it cannot utilize DNA testing, which is a controversial method among Indigenous communities who say it desecrates the remains of their ancestors.
In some cases, this leaves only a paper trail to find clues about where the ancestors or remains were taken from and how to take steps to return them.
"In the last 20 years, we've returned about 90 of our ancestors back to us," Halbritter said. "Through sacred ceremonies and spiritual ceremonies not open to the public, we've returned them to their resting place. Their home."
Dr. Van Tuerenhout says their office regularly sends letters to various tribes trying to find a possible match.
These letters could lead to more conversations or a visit to the museum to examine the ancestors or belongings in question.
Its work, he says, is essential to HMNS for one reason.
"Well, it's the right thing to do. So, there is the answer," he said. "These belongings do not belong to us."
The issue of child custody and Native Americans has long been a point of painful history in the United States. In June 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the 1978 Indian Child Welfare Act, which regulates the removal and out-of-home placement of Native children. A July 2024 report from the U.S. Department of the Interior found that over 900 children died nationwide in forced boarding schools from 1819 to 1969.
READ:
Back in July, the governing Liberals decided to quietly announce they were cutting funding to Indigenous searches for unmarked children’s graves around residential schools.
Indigenous communities were initially offered up to $3 million per year to help defray the costs of identification.
However, the federal government chose to cap those funds — in the absence of any consultations with Indigenous leaders — at $500,000. Thankfully, the Trudeau government reversed course in August and restored the original funding allotment of $3 million.
It is instructive to note that Ottawa has constitutional competence for — and thus a fiduciary responsibility to — Indigenous Peoples in Canada.
All of this got me thinking about one of the most enduring features of Indigenous/non-Indigenous relations in Canada — namely, the federal government’s obsession with pinching pennies when it comes to our Indigenous communities.
One of the critical areas of investigation around this topic is fully understanding its key drivers.
Why would monetary considerations be top of mind for colonial and Canadian governments for hundreds of years? What should we infer from that fixation with dollars and cents?
Significantly, I’m not talking about budget constraints, lower reserve costs, special circumstances or an increase in wealthier Indigenous communities.
I’m suggesting there has been a deliberate and ongoing mindset in Ottawa that starts with this premise: How do we find ways to cut funding for Indigenous Peoples?
The whole point of
colonial and Canadian government policies toward Indigenous Peoples was
to assimilate them and, if that didn’t work, to eradicate them outright. (kill off)
That way, the federal government’s “honour of the Crown” and its fiduciary commitment would come to a screeching halt. Crudely put, the costs associated with “Indian status” would no longer be necessary.
Residential schools in Canada were intended, among other things, to sever the bond between Indigenous children and their parents and reserve community. As they assimilated into white society, this would eventually lead to fewer First Nations people on the government’s payrolls.
The schools (many were of poor construction and deadly firetraps) were a case study in cost-cutting: Indigenous children constantly complained of being hungry and cold and often went without medications. Even when children died at these schools, the government refused to pay the costs of returning them to their Indigenous families.
Similarly, the horrible “Sixties Scoop” was a continuation of this same line of thinking: force Indigenous kids into foster care and foreign adoption to reduce costs over time.
The federal government moved in the late 1950s with the express intention of saving money by turning the care and welfare of Indigenous children over to provincial child protection services.
With respect to the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls, the Trudeau Liberals have been excruciatingly slow in implementing many of the final report’s 231 “calls for justice.”
Only five per cent or so of the government’s promise to spend $724 million on supporting Indigenous women and girls with new shelters and transitional housing has been spent.
From the advent of colonial governments in Canada in the mid-1700s, each one has sought to reduce expenditures for Indigenous Peoples. Officials in the old Department of Indian Affairs — long before its current iteration as the Department of Crown Indigenous Relations — were always crunching the actuarial numbers to identify when payments to Indigenous communities would finally end.
Don’t forget the cost-savings sought through violating solemn treaties, withholding annuity and land dispossession payments, building low-budget “Indian hospitals” and even denying benefits for returning Indigenous soldiers from the world wars.
Much of the cutting of Indigenous monies is consistent with a colonial mindset or project that has devalued, dehumanized and degraded Indigenous Peoples from the very beginning.
The racist rationale was simple: they were only going to die off anyway, they would forever be ””uncivilized,” pagan “savages,” they would never be smart enough to know what to do with the land and financial resources, and they would always be expendable, largely invisible and, most assuredly worthless.
I’m sure that I’ve missed many other examples of damaging government cost-cutting. But one common theme that is painfully obvious is that Canadian governments have historically sought to short-change Indigenous Peoples.
In the end, the First Peoples just weren’t worth spending government money on. You have to conclude that the real power brokers of this country never really accorded them much value from the outset.
Founder of the NWT Native Court Workers Association, former Yellowknife city councillor and member of the NWT Human Rights Commission passed away this week at the age of 71.
Posted By: James O'Connor December 4, 2024
Gail Cyr was known for her unwavering bravery fighting for Indigenous people in the North, and her life’s work was recognized nationally in 2022, when she was invested into the Order of Canada.
Cyr passed away on Tuesday, her son Jesse Wheeler posted to social media. She was 71.
“Thank you for your kind words and your sharing of stories,” Wheeler stated. “She led an incredibly full life. She leaves this place much better than she found it.
“That is all we can ask of a person. She did it tenfold. One-hundred fold.”
Cyr is originally from Nelson House, MB. A survivor of the Sixties Scoop, Gail was one of seven siblings all apprehended from her Cree parents.
In a 2022 profile in UpHere Magazine, Cyr stated: “There were a lot of rough times, and there were a lot of lonely times.”
The racism and sexism she recalled after moving to Winnipeg, led her to move to Yellowknife in 1974.
Cyr wrote a series of columns for Northern News Services in recent years, one detailed her early experiences in her new home of Yellowknife — on the Range.
“I started work at the Gold Range behind the bar pouring drinks as I had at the Spaghetti Factory in Winnipeg, with the one exception that hot pants and high heels were required as hostess wear,” she wrote in her column.
“I made it to the floor from bartending. I loved it. We walked miles every night carrying a tray of 16 of the largest draft glasses in Canada, perhaps 14 ounces – not like the wimpy glasses from down south – and ashtrays, change and a walled folder for bills.”
Cyr later was a coordinator with the Indian Brotherhood of the NWT, and was the first executive director of the NWT Native Court Workers Association.
She served on Yellowknife city council, worked for the territorial government and was a special advisor on Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls.
She also enjoyed live performances, producing costumes for the Northern Arts and Cultural Centre and performing with her son, Jesse.
Cyr was the former executive director of the Native Women’s Association and up until her passing, was on the NWT Human Rights Commission.
Charles Dent currently chairs the commission. He recalls first meeting Cyr at one of the first Folk on the Rocks festivals in the 1980s when Cyr was with St. John Ambulance and he was a volunteer firefighter.
Later on, when the pair were on Yellowknife City Council in the 1980s, with Cyr being the only Indigenous councillor. Dent said Cyr impressed by doing all the required reading and really made an effort to make good decisions to help the city develop.
Then, when Cyr joined the Human Rights Commission, Dent said she translated her personal experiences into leadership.
“She brought her … understanding and empathy that goes with having experienced the discrimination she personally went through during the Sixties Scoop,” he said.
“She was never afraid to talk about her experiences, never afraid to talk about how that affected her and others like her that you know had experienced the same sorts of things.
“She was courageous, because she was willing to share her experience. She tried to help people empathize with what people have gone through, and help along our path to reconciliation.
“As we developed the Commission, we developed our reconciliation strategy, she was key to helping us set that up, and I’m gonna miss her. We’re gonna miss her.”
CKLB will update this story when Cyr’s funeral arrangements are known.
“You will be told you are ugly or ‘too beautiful to be Indigenous!’ If you were fostered into a white home, you will be told to your parents were drinkers, and you will be told to ignore any pull to your family you lost.”
– Gail Cyr, on growing up in a non-Indigenous community
🔔🔔🔔
By Trace L Hentz, blog editor
Have you done an internet search?
Do you use a personal computer or a phone?
To find you updates, I do use google search and firefox duck-duck go, etc. But I noticed stories (using keywords) are not there anymore, and I do wonder how much longer this website/blog can exist...
I do research all the time, but keywords are disappearing, and it's happening so fast I hear alarm bells going off.
The internet was FREE (to get us addicted) - so NOW maybe the inventors (like Google) got what they wanted from us to train their AI, so now they don't want the internet to be free anymore - news we need to read will be behind paywalls...
Do a google search like "adoptees" and see what you find....
I try to keep you current on all kinds of news and topics, but it's getting weird... I started this as a blog in late 2009, the internet was just starting to become a treasure trove.
Putting original writing on the internet may not exist much longer. I KNOW that books, on paper, cannot be altered, but online, content can and does and will disappear... I have seen it with a free book I put on its own website in 2022: https://www.findingtheinvisibles.com - Get this: Images started to disappear. I noticed that chapters were out of order, though I uploaded everything in order. One chapter three disappeared! (Now it is there. I reloaded it...)
👉👇I had a thought I'd do an old-fashioned printed newsletter instead of this website if the internet does blow up and disappear. I'd mail it out to you, if necessary.
But that costs money to print and mail, right? I'd have to charge you for a subscription! I never wanted to do that...
Are we going backwards? Will we have to get newsletters by mail? But the post office has issues, too.
Why is this happening?
Information is needed to counter the chaos! (and outright lies and panic and craziness)
We know the adoption industry makes billions every year and their propaganda was all you'd see about ADOPTION... but adoptees (you and me) changed that... we fought back with our voices... and I think we WON!
I just wanted you to be aware that this information, years and years of articles, will remain free, as long as I can keep it up and running. (I do pay $$ for domain names.) (I do not run ads or make any money off this website.) (If you buy a book through bookshop or amazon I will see a small payment as a royalty.)
UPDATE: The COUNT 2024 (of adoptees) didn't work. Not enough adoptees took the survey and mailed it back to me. So that failure is on me... it didn't work. I just wanted you to know...
So a huge thanks for reading, thanks for making comments and most of all, thank you for your emails to me.
Just keep my email if this website disappears: tracelara@pm.me.
We will work this out and build our future together... as a community
In the Anishinaabe creation story, the first woman to arrive on Earth, Sky Woman, is given a home on a great turtle's back.
Anishinaabe grandmother Vivian Recollet says the turtle also played a role in her own personal creation story.
"Because I was not raised with my parents, it was that turtle that came to get me, to bring me to this beautiful life," she told Unreserved host Rosanna Deerchild.
Recollet is a member of the Turtle Clan from Wiikwemkoong Unceded Territory on Manitoulin Island in Ontario. As a Sixties Scoop survivor, reconnecting with Anishinaabe culture and teachings as an adult brought her on a journey of healing.
The path to reclaiming her identity reminds her of the turtle's teaching, one of the Seven Grandfather Teachings: truth.
"I have come to find the truth, in every facet of my life," she said. "It was the impact of colonization that changed our whole beautiful life journey from the one that had always been there for us as Anishinaabe people."
Today, Recollet feels a responsibility to return that gift of healing back to the turtle in her home city of Toronto.
She is an adviser to Turtle Protectors, or Mishiikenh Gizhaasowin in Anishinaabemowin. The Indigenous-led program helps safeguard urban park-dwelling turtles against threats like foot traffic, pets, fishing and over-predation.
"We have a responsibility as Anishinaabe people to take care of those beings because they are the ones that sustained us from the beginning of time. They're the ones that taught us how to survive, how to live," she said. "The least we could do is honour them and protect them as well."
Turtle Protectors was founded in 2022 by Carolynne Crawley and Jenny Davis. It began its work in High Park in Toronto's west end, but has since expanded its program to include six other parks in the Greater Toronto Area.
Its staff and volunteers raise awareness of urban turtles among park goers, protect turtle nests, and run a hotline to field reports of vulnerable or injured turtles.
Crawley was inspired to care for her local shell-dwellers after encountering a nesting mother snapping turtle on a walk in High Park. The encounter reminded Crawley of the importance of slowing down and being present.
"Turtle is such a vulnerable being, but is so in tune to their surroundings.… I think about how many times people may walk through a park and really not notice all the relations around them," she said.
"So really, Turtle tells us to tune in, to pay attention."
Crawley and Davis quickly discovered there was no official turtle protection program in Toronto, despite all eight species of turtle in Ontario being listed as species at risk.
Crawley says turtles play important roles in the health of their ecosystems, including keeping waters clean by eating the dead plants and dead animals in the water.
"And this work is not just about turtle; it's about all our relations as well."
Crawley sees her work as part of repairing the harms caused to the natural environment by colonization and resource extraction. She envisions a path forward where humanity embraces a reciprocal relationship to the natural world, as is found in Indigenous philosophies.
"The Earth can survive and thrive without us humans, but we cannot survive without the Earth," she said.
"It could make a huge difference if we were to see all of these beings as family or as kin, to be treated with the same love and respect and gratitude as we treat our human loved ones. If we all just did that one thing, then so much can change."
In the Anishinaabe Turtle Song, the turtle invites humanity on a journey to heal our Earth.
When Anishinaabe elder Garry Sault discovered the song, it was love at first listen. Sault credits the song to Elder Dan Pine, a medicine man from Garden River First Nation who passed away in 1992.
The song tells the story of the turtle setting out on a journey across the land and waters.
"He sees all his medicines and his places of beauty have been rolled over by a bulldozer," Sault said. "Instead of healing, they desecrated the land and put it in a bad way."
"So he's saying come along with the Anishinaabe and us, and let's look at the Earth and all of the things that have to be looked after, and see if we can help to heal it."
Elder Garry Sault sings the Anishinaabe turtle song and shares its important lessons
Sault says that the Anishinaabe have a responsibility to take care of the land and waters. For his part, Sault takes part in projects protecting his local environment, such as monitoring the health of nearby rivers and streams. The Turtle Song serves as a tool for engaging governments and business interests with his message.
"Then when I go into the things that are not so nice for them to hear, they have a reason to listen to me because I told them what happened, why the turtle is doing it all."
"I want those people to come along with me on the same journey that I'm taking so that we can help to save the Earth in this time of climate change, make it into a journey where both of us are looking for the same outcome, a good and safe place for our future generations."
This story is part of a series from Unreserved called Sacred Seven. The series explores the seven sacred teachings and introduces us to Indigenous Elders, knowledge keepers and community members who are putting those teachings into action.
LINK: https://www.cbc.ca/radio/unreserved/sacred-seven-protecting-turtles-1.7393114
STORY: https://indianz.com/News/2024/12/03/cronkite-news-museum-continues-to-move-slowly-on-repatriation/
In NAGPRA’s first years, ASM began repatriating artifacts and sacred objects that were not associated with Native American burials to tribes, according to documents from the Federal Register.
South Korea used to be the world's largest source of babies for adoption. It's believed 200,000 children are part of the Korean adoptee diaspora, many of whom were sent away illegally and unethically. Those babies are now adults determined to trace their biological roots. Teresa Tang goes on an emotional journey with CNA's Lim Yun Suk.
Cannon Falls, MINNESOTA, written by Lisa Kaczke
The Northfield History Center voluntarily invited the Prairie Island Tribal Historic Preservation Office (THPO) to review its collection and then took steps for the THPO to take immediate possession of the items. In a process that has been historically fraught with difficulties for tribes, the willingness of the Northfield History Center made it a positive experience and cemented a foundation for future collaborations between the two entities.
“Oftentimes, it’s a struggle to get some of these objects returned so whenever we have a volunteer and cooperating partner, it makes the process so much easier and in this instance, we found a true partnership that we are building upon with our friends over at Northfield History Center,” said Franky Jackson, Prairie Island’s tribal historic compliance officer.
The Northfield History Center announced Nov. 18 that its Board of Directors approved the deaccessioning of the items. The items are sacred Native American items that have significance to local Indigenous people, according to the announcement.
“These items have been in the Northfield History Center collection for many years, but they do not belong to the Northfield community. They belong to the people that lived in this area long before us, and that made and used these items,” Executive Director Sean Allen said in a statement. “Today we are proud to be able to repatriate these important pieces to their rightful owners and to build a lasting partnership with the Prairie Island Indian Community.”
It’s important to tribes to identify which institutions have their items and which people within the tribe can benefit from having the items returned, Jackson said.
“When it comes to our sacred items, this is part of how we heal our hoop. This is part of how we heal our communities, is by capturing and bringing home these sacred items that help us with our ceremonies,” Jackson said.
Repatriation is also related to the tribe’s cultural revitalization. It’s “crucially important” for Prairie Island’s artists to have access to the items to have a connection to their relatives’ handiwork, carry forward the artistry and pass it down to next generations, Jackson said.
“That’s a big part of what we’re doing with our Tribal Historic Preservation Office here. As we accession in items, it’s our goal to allow our community-based artists to have access to those items,” Jackson said.
The process for institutions to repatriate items to tribes is regulated by the federal Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) of 1990,which requires institutions that receive federal funding to transfer Native American human remains and objects of cultural patrimony to lineal descendants and culturally affiliated tribes. Despite the law, thousands of Native American human remains and artifacts remained in museums.
A revision of NAGPRA went into effect in January that streamlines the repatriation process, gives tribes the power to define what is a sacred object and gives tribes more jurisdiction over the institutions’ use of human remains and objects. It also requires institutions to inventory all of their Native American artifacts within the next five years.
Under the revised law, an institution has 90 days to respond once a claim has been filed. Prior to the change in January, "institutions could drag their feet and take as long as they wanted. In some instances, it has taken us literally years to reconcile some items,” Jackson said.
An example of that is the noose that was known as the Mankato Hanging Rope in the Minnesota Historical Society’s collection. The noose was used in the hanging of Wicanhpi Wastedanpi (Good Little Stars) on Dec. 26, 1862 in Mankato as part of the largest mass execution in U.S. history. The Minnesota Historical Society returned the noose earlier this year after Prairie Island submitted a claim under the new NAGPRA rules. The repatriation of the noose this year came after Dakota tribes’ “11-year struggle” to have it returned, Jackson said.
“With some of the new legislation that took place with the law, that strengthens the tribal voice when it comes to certain things and it allows us to have this done in a way that’s timely for us,” Jackson said.
Often, Prairie Island learns of an object belonging to the tribe when a museum contacts the THPO or the object is put up for auction to the highest bidder. Both can be a “tumulteous” process for the tribe, Jackson said.
Museums who received the federal funding appropriated by Congress during the Covid-19 pandemic are now required to inventory their collections under the revised law. The Prairie Island THPO is seeing an influx of inquiries from institutions across the United States to review items in their collections that they believe belong to Prairie Island. Noah White, Prairie Island’s tribal historic preservation officer, estimates they’ve heard from 30-35 institutions since the beginning of the year.
“Nobody ever really reached out to us in the past. We’d always find out from a different source,” White said.
After Prairie Island’s struggles to reclaim items, they had “jubilation and excitement” when the Northfield History Center reached out and the THPO was able to easily bring the items home, Jackson said.
“They looked within their collection, identified some items that they knew were going to be controversial, some that may have fallen under the federal definition of that law, and they were proactive,” Jackson said.
The process with the Northfield History Center moved quickly.
“They rolled the doors open. They greeted us, they were very welcoming,” Jackson said.
After Allen and the Board of Directors reached out, the Prairie Island THPO visited the Northfield History Center to inventory its collection and identified several items that met the definition as a sacred object or object of cultural patrimony under NAGPRA, Jackson said.
Prairie Island had to formally file a NAGPRA claim on the items, but on the THPO’s second visit, the Northfield History Center established a temporary loan agreement to allow the THPO to take possession of the objects immediately.
“That is very rare. That doesn’t happen often,” Jackson said.
When a tribe reviews a museum’s collection and identifies items it wants returned, it can create a lot of “anxiety” and “angst” for the tribe, Jackson said.
“To have this institution introduce a loan agreement as part of the solution just demonstrated beyond measures that they had more than a passing interest to return these objects to the appropriate people,” Jackson said. “That really demonstrated that we have a trusted partner at the table that wanted to do the morally right thing.”
Most of the items that were returned by the Northfield History Center will be held by the tribe as objects of cultural patrimony, meaning that they belong to the broader tribe, Jackson said.
The items included two large ceremonial headdresses made of eagle feathers, handmade beads and other materials, according to the Northfield History Center. The headdresses are “exquisite,” Jackson said. The repatriation helps bring those items back into the Prairie Island community so they can view them and learn the story of the repatriation, he said.
Some of the objects are considered sacred and won’t have public access, he said.
There were several “wonderful and beautiful” sacred pipes in the collection, Jackson said. The provenance on some of the pipes was detailed and the THPO was able to identify the families to whom the pipes need to be returned.
“That’s a wonderful, wonderful experience for us to be able to work with this institution to be able to find that pathway home for some of these objects,” Jackson said.
Prairie Island is also working with several other museums in Minnesota on voluntary repatriation and to create repatriation policies. The cross-cultural exchange and collaboration with the Northfield History Center shows what’s possible. Prairie Island plans to collaborate with the history center on its exhibits and history center staff plans to visit Prairie Island to see their collection and buffalo herd, Jackson said.
“The partnership with Northfield is going to go much deeper,” he said.
This ascendancy and its accompanying tragedy were exposed in a report written in 1924 by Lakota activist Zitkala-Sa, a.k.a. Gertrude Simmon...
We conclude this series & continue the conversation by naming that adoption is genocide. This naming refers to the process of genocide that breaks kinship ties through adoption & other forms of family separation & policing 🧵#NAAM2022 #AdoptionIsTraumaAND #AdopteeTwitter #FFY 1/6 pic.twitter.com/46v0mWISZ1
— Adoptee Futures CIC (@AdopteeFutures) November 29, 2022