Get new posts by email:

How to Use this Blog

BOOZHOO! We've amassed tons of information and important history on this blog since 2010. If you have a keyword, use the search box below. Also check out the reference section above. If you have a question or need help searching, use the contact form at the bottom of the blog.

We want you to use BOOKSHOP! (the editor will earn a small amount of money or commission. (we thank you) (that is our disclaimer statement)

This is a blog. It is not a peer-reviewed journal, not a sponsored publication... WE DO NOT HAVE ADS or earn MONEY from this website. The ideas, news and thoughts posted are sourced… or written by the editor or contributors.

EMAIL ME: (outlook email is gone)


Monday, October 16, 2023

Report confirms slow progress on repatriation of ancestors and sacred items 

Supported by a federal NAGPRA grant, tribal nations, History Colorado, Colorado State University, Colorado Department of Natural Resources and the Colorado Commission of Indian Affairs participated in a reburial ceremony in Colorado in June 2016. Photo courtesy History Colorado

Tuesday, October 10, 2023
By Acee Agoyo
It’s been more than 30 years since the passage of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) but federal agencies and museums are still far behind in returning ancestral remains and cultural property to their rightful places. A snapshot report released by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) on Tuesday shows just how NAGPRA’s promises to Native peoples are going unfulfilled. Since 1990, fewer than half of the 208,698 ancestral remains being held by agencies and museums have gone through the complete NAGPRA process, according to official data. And when it comes to the 2,619,951 sacred items being held by agencies and museums, the record is better — but the GAO identifies ongoing “challenges” in complying with NAGPRA. According to the report, issued a day after President Joe Biden declared Indigenous Peoples’ Day, nearly a third of funerary objects haven’t gone through the complete process. “The program’s 2022 report notes that these agencies and museums have not completed the NAGPRA regulatory process for 52 percent of human remains and 29 percent of associated funerary objects,” the GAO report states. “Until the process is complete, the items are not available for repatriation,” the report adds, confirming that American Indians, Alaska Natives and Native Hawaiians are still being denied their ancestral and cultural heritages, some 33 years after NAGPRA’s passage in 1990. To help improve compliance with NAGPRA, GAO recommends federal agencies strengthen their tribal consultation policies. The report refers to “concerns” raised by lineal descendants, tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations. “Failure to consult with tribes, or to consult effectively, may result in irrevocable damage to cultural resources,” the GAO states. The report also states that the U.S. government isn’t doing enough to address the illegal removal of cultural items from federal and tribal lands. According to the GAO, “resource constraints, competing priorities, and limitations with data to support decision-making have hampered agencies’ efforts to prevent, investigate, and prosecute incidents of theft and damage.” Congress has taken additional action to protect tribes with the passage of the Safeguard Tribal Objects of Patrimony Act, also known as the STOP Act. The GAO report notes that the Department of the Interior has started developing regulations to implement the new law, an effort that began just a few months ago. The GAO also points out that Interior has yet to finalize new NAGPRA regulations that are supposed to streamline the repatriation of items held by federal agencies and museums. The work began more than two years ago, in the fall of 2021, and the proposed revisions were released almost a year ago.
Native American Priorities:
Protection and Repatriation of Human Remains and Other Cultural Items
According to the Government Accountability Office, federal agencies and museums have not completed the NAGPRA regulatory process for 52 percent of human remains and 29 percent of associated funerary objects as of September 2023. Source: Native American Priorities: Protection and Repatriation of Human Remains and Other Cultural Items

Finally, the GAO said the sale of tribal items in overseas markets remains an ongoing challenge. Implementing outstanding recommendations from prior NAGPRA reports in 2010, 2018, 2019 and 2021 could help address the issue, according to the report. “Implementing the remaining eight could help Interior target efforts to analyze and address risks to Native American cultural resources and improve how federal agencies communicate with tribes that request assistance with repatriating cultural items from overseas auctions,” the GAO said, noting that 47 other NAGPRA recommendations have been “fully implemented” as of September 2023. “This could also improve agencies’ efforts to consult with tribes on certain federal efforts that could affect cultural resources,” the report continued. The 2010, 2018, 2019 and 2021 NAGPRA reports were followed by Congressional testimony in February 2022, when the GAO discussed the challenges facing federal agency compliance with the law. 
The leader of the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs said it was clear that the work was far from complete. “While progress is certainly being made, the journey continues for tens of thousands of ancestors and millions of cultural items to find their way home,” said Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), the chair of the legislative committee, noting that Congress originally thought it would take 10 years to repatriate ancestors and items held by agencies and museums. “And the promise of NAGPRA continues,” said Schatz.
Indianz.Com Video: ‘Our iwi, our bones are sacred’: Nāpua Greig #NAGPRA
Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) said NAGPRA has helped Native people in her home state of Alaska reclaim 1,843 ancestors from museums and agencies. “But there is much more to be done,” she added. “The work is not finished,” said Murkowski, the vice chair of the committee. “There are still 406 Alaska Native individuals who remain housed in 26 museums or federal agencies, pending consultation and notification prior to repatriation.” At the hearing, experts on repatriation in Native communities explained why compliance with NAGPRA is so important to them. Carmen Hulu Lindsey, the chair of the board of trustees for the Office of Hawaiian Affairs, said it is critical for the iwi, or the bones, of ancestors to return home. “We identify with each other, literally, by the bone,” Lindsey told the committee, which opened the hearing with a Native Hawaiian song about the important cultural tradition. “Not only do the iwi possess the spiritual power and essence of the individual, they are also our direct connection to our ancestors for communication and guidance.” “For we do not bury our dead, we kanu, or plant them, back into the earth from whence they came to continue to nourish, heal and guide future generations,” she continued. “This critical cycle has been disrupted due to the mass disinterment and disaggregation of our ancestors, especially in the last century of unfettered development in our island home.” 
 Rosita Worl, the president of the Sealaska Heritage Institute in Alaska, served on the NAGPRA Review Committee for 13 years, monitoring and reviewing the implementation of the law. She said Native people face a second indignity even when their ancestral remains are returned to their communities. “I would also recommend and allow for the reburial of ancestral human remains at the site from which they were taken,” said Worl, a citizen of the Central Council of Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes. “Often, we are told to sneak onto federal lands, to rebury our ancestors from the original site from which they were taken. We do not believe that this is appropriate.”
 The GAO’s snapshot report was based in part on data released by the Department of the Interior’s National NAGPRA Program. The figures about completed reviews of ancestral remains and funerary objects are taken from the annual program reports. The 2022 report, for example, shows that 108,328 ancestral remains are still being held in collections across the country. 
According to the data, Illinois, Ohio and California are home to museums and agencies with the largest numbers of Native ancestors. A table in the report further shows that the University of California at Berkeley, the Illinois State Museum and the Ohio History Connection are holding onto the three largest collections of Native ancestors. Harvard University in Massachusetts closely follows.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please: Share your reaction, your thoughts, and your opinions. Be passionate, be unapologetic. Offensive remarks will not be published. We are getting more and more spam. Comments will be monitored.
Use the comment form at the bottom of this website which is private and sent direct to Trace.

Happy Visitors!

They Took Us Away

They Took Us Away
click image to see more and read more

Blog Archive

Most READ Posts


You are not alone

You are not alone

To Veronica Brown

Veronica, we adult adoptees are thinking of you today and every day. We will be here when you need us. Your journey in the adopted life has begun, nothing can revoke that now, the damage cannot be undone. Be courageous, you have what no adoptee before you has had; a strong group of adult adoptees who know your story, who are behind you and will always be so.

Diane Tells His Name

click photo

60s Scoop Survivors Legal Support


Lost Birds on Al Jazeera Fault Lines

Lost Birds on Al Jazeera Fault Lines
click to read and listen about Trace, Diane, Julie and Suzie


As the single largest unregulated industry in the United States, adoption is viewed as a benevolent action that results in the formation of “forever families.”
The truth is that it is a very lucrative business with a known sales pitch. With profits last estimated at over $1.44 billion dollars a year, mothers who consider adoption for their babies need to be very aware that all of this promotion clouds the facts and only though independent research can they get an accurate account of what life might be like for both them and their child after signing the adoption paperwork.


Original Birth Certificate Map in the USA

Why tribes do not recommend the DNA swab

Rebecca Tallbear entitled: “DNA, Blood, and Racializing the Tribe”, bearing out what I only inferred:

Detailed discussion of the Bering Strait theory and other scientific theories about the population of the modern-day Americas is beyond the scope of this essay. However, it should be noted that Indian people have expressed suspicion that DNA analysis is a tool that scientists will use to support theories about the origins of tribal people that contradict tribal oral histories and origin stories. Perhaps more important,the alternative origin stories of scientists are seen as intending to weaken tribal land and other legal claims (and even diminish a history of colonialism?) that are supported in U.S. federal and tribal law. As genetic evidence has already been used to resolve land conflicts in Asian and Eastern European countries, this is not an unfounded fear.

Google Followers