Get new posts by email:

How to Use this Blog

BOOZHOO! We've amassed tons of information and important history on this blog since 2010. If you have a keyword, use the search box below. Also check out the reference section above. If you have a question or need help searching, use the contact form at the bottom of the blog.

We want you to use BOOKSHOP! (the editor will earn a small amount of money or commission. (we thank you) (that is our disclaimer statement)

This is a blog. It is not a peer-reviewed journal, not a sponsored publication... WE DO NOT HAVE ADS or earn MONEY from this website. The ideas, news and thoughts posted are sourced… or written by the editor or contributors.

EMAIL ME: (outlook email is gone)


Friday, June 10, 2016

BREAKING NEWS: BIA Publishes Final ICWA Rule

Courtesy National Indian Child Welfare Association
Acting Assistant Secretary - Indian Affairs Lawrence S. Roberts today announced that the agency has published an updated final rule in the implementation of the Indian Child Welfare Act.

Breaking: BIA Publishes Final ICWA Rule

Underscoring Congress’s intent to protect the cohesiveness of Indian children, families and communities in state welfare proceedings, Acting Assistant Secretary - Indian Affairs Lawrence S. Roberts today announced that the agency has published an updated final rule in the implementation of the Indian Child Welfare Act. Roberts said the 360-page rule will provide a more consistent interpretation of the 38-year-old statute “regardless of the child welfare worker, judge or state involved.”

“We received thousands of comments from the public during the rulemaking process―more than three times the number of comments than any other rule we’ve published,” said Roberts at the press conference announcing the rule this afternoon (Wednesday). “An overwhelming number of those comments came from the tribes, so it’s clearly an issue of public interest. And we think this rule will help state agencies and courts in the application of the law and provide more consistency across the board.”
Roberts said the new rule advances the highest ideals of the federal trust responsibility in protecting and promoting cohesiveness for Indian children and their families. While praising the work of state courts across the country who work tirelessly to ensure the implementation of ICWA, he said there are still gaps in the consistency and application of ICWA in state proceedings.

“The final rule builds upon the work of tribes and states by clarifying the Indian Child Welfare Act’s requirements, promoting consistency in Indian child-placement proceedings, and ensuring that regardless of the state court forum, children and their parents receive the active efforts envisioned by Congress to maintain family and community,” Roberts said. “Child welfare workers, state court judges and state agencies deserve clear rules as they work with Native families and tribes to implement the protections of the law. This rule promotes family and community by ensuring that if a Native child has been removed from their home previously, they will have a pathway for reunification with their family.”

Under the new rule, all state courts in foster-care, termination-of-parental-rights, and adoption proceedings will now be required to ask whether the child is an “Indian child” under the definitions articulated in ICWA and subject to the law’s procedures; prompt notice of involuntary proceedings; and minimizing unnecessary separations of Indian children from their families.  Additionally, the rule requires that “active efforts” will replace “reasonable efforts” with the overall goal of reunifying the child with his or her family.

“Reunification with a child’s family is a standard the United States strives for in child welfare,” said Roberts. “It’s the gold standard and best practice and ICWA is the minimum federal standard, because tribal families continue to be broken up because of inconsistent application of the law. We are concerned that without these federal regulations that the disparities among Indian children in state custody may continue.”

Notably, Roberts said the final rule also addresses the wishes of Indian parents wanting to place their children for adoption, making it clear that the decision to place children for voluntary adoptions lies with the child’s parents. As well, the rule includes a number of new provisions which respect and enforce the confidentiality and privacy of all Indian children in state court proceedings.

The BIA has been working on strengthening the federal statute for several years. In 2014, the Department conducted five listening sessions with tribes, judicial organizations and child welfare professionals to determine whether the BIA ICWA Guidelines for State Courts should be updated and, if so, what changes should be made. The agency received hundreds of comments from tribes, child welfare professionals and state court judges, which overwhelmingly recommended updated guidelines.

That November, the Attorney General’s Advisory Committee on American Indian and Alaska Native Children Exposed to Violence also recommended that the Department of the Interior issue new regulations in order to better implement the law. Tribes and other commenters were near-universal in noting the lack of compliance with and inconsistent adherence to the guidelines in state courts, calling for the promulgation of new regulations for a more consistent interpretation of ICWA.
Subsequently, in February 2015, the agency issued revised Guidelines for State Courts and Agencies in Indian Child Custody Proceedings—the first such update since the guidelines were originally issued when ICWA (Public Law 95-608) was passed in 1978.

A month later, the agency, then headed by former Assistant Secretary Kevin Washburn, announced its intention to seek a federal rule to reinforce the 38-year-old federal statute in state courts across the country, where Indian children continue to be removed from their families and communities at far higher rates than their non-Indian peers.

Public meetings and tribal consultations were held in locations throughout the country, including Portland, Oregon; Rapid City, South Dakota; Albuquerque, New Mexico; Prior Lake, Minnesota; Tulsa, Oklahoma, and by phone conference. The hearings were attended by hundreds of tribal members, attorneys, social workers, adult pre- and post-ICWA adoptees, and tribal leaders, as well as lawyers representing the American Academy of Adoption Attorneys.

At times contentious and emotionally-charged, the ICWA public meetings were crowded and sometimes standing-room-only, drawing sharp comments from the tribes and members of the adoption industry, at odds over what constitutes the “best interests” for Native children. Often, complained tribal leaders, they are rarely given adequate notice or respect in court proceedings involving their children in ICWA proceedings. Conversely, members of the adoption industry responded with similar talking points that ICWA is “bad for children.”

For months, as the two sides skirmished in the hearings, the BIA continued gathering input and comments toward publishing a final rule. In anticipation of the final rule, the Phoenix, Arizona-based Goldwater Institute filed suit in federal court in July 2015 seeking to overturn the Indian Child Welfare Act because it contends that the 38-year-old statute is unconstitutional.

The new federal regulations provide a more consistent interpretation of and promote compliance with the Act by incorporating standard procedures and requirements for state courts and child welfare agencies in Indian child custody proceedings. Roberts said that although the final rule is being published today, it will not go into effect for 180 days in order to give time to the tribes, state agencies and courts to familiarize themselves with the new rule and for training and technical assistance.

“ICWA was designed to safeguard Native children from undue separation from their families and cultural identity. This rule will achieve consistent implementation of a law that remains critical to protecting the best interest of Native children and promoting successful Native communities,” said Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell, who serves as chair of the President’s White House Council on Native American Affairs. “It is in a child's best interest to keep their family intact when it can be done safely, and provide pathways to connect with the child's larger family and community. This rule reflects the highest standards in child welfare.”

RELATED: Breaking: Federal Agency Publishes Proposed Rule, Announces Major Grant to Implement ICWA

A new federal rule requires judges to ask whether a child is Native American during foster-care and adoption proceedings. Under the rule, judges also must ask about a child’s status as a tribal member during hearings to determine whether or not a mother’s or father’s parental rights will be terminated. The new rule is part of the Indian Child Welfare Act and it’s intended to reunite Native American families after statistics showed they were broken up at higher rates.
I heard this announcement when I was in SAN DIEGO at the ICWA conference!  Good News... Trace

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please: Share your reaction, your thoughts, and your opinions. Be passionate, be unapologetic. Offensive remarks will not be published. We are getting more and more spam. Comments will be monitored.
Use the comment form at the bottom of this website which is private and sent direct to Trace.

Happy Visitors!

They Took Us Away

They Took Us Away
click image to see more and read more

Blog Archive

Most READ Posts


You are not alone

You are not alone

To Veronica Brown

Veronica, we adult adoptees are thinking of you today and every day. We will be here when you need us. Your journey in the adopted life has begun, nothing can revoke that now, the damage cannot be undone. Be courageous, you have what no adoptee before you has had; a strong group of adult adoptees who know your story, who are behind you and will always be so.

Diane Tells His Name

click photo

60s Scoop Survivors Legal Support


Lost Birds on Al Jazeera Fault Lines

Lost Birds on Al Jazeera Fault Lines
click to read and listen about Trace, Diane, Julie and Suzie


As the single largest unregulated industry in the United States, adoption is viewed as a benevolent action that results in the formation of “forever families.”
The truth is that it is a very lucrative business with a known sales pitch. With profits last estimated at over $1.44 billion dollars a year, mothers who consider adoption for their babies need to be very aware that all of this promotion clouds the facts and only though independent research can they get an accurate account of what life might be like for both them and their child after signing the adoption paperwork.


Original Birth Certificate Map in the USA

Why tribes do not recommend the DNA swab

Rebecca Tallbear entitled: “DNA, Blood, and Racializing the Tribe”, bearing out what I only inferred:

Detailed discussion of the Bering Strait theory and other scientific theories about the population of the modern-day Americas is beyond the scope of this essay. However, it should be noted that Indian people have expressed suspicion that DNA analysis is a tool that scientists will use to support theories about the origins of tribal people that contradict tribal oral histories and origin stories. Perhaps more important,the alternative origin stories of scientists are seen as intending to weaken tribal land and other legal claims (and even diminish a history of colonialism?) that are supported in U.S. federal and tribal law. As genetic evidence has already been used to resolve land conflicts in Asian and Eastern European countries, this is not an unfounded fear.

Google Followers