How to Use this Blog

Howdy! We've amassed tons of information and important history on this blog since 2010. If you have a keyword, use the search box below. Also check out the reference section above. If you have a question or need help searching, use the contact form at the bottom of the blog.

“As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.” If you buy any of the books at the links provided, the editor will earn a small amount of money or commission. (we thank you) (that is our disclaimer statement)

This is a blog. It is not a peer-reviewed journal, not a sponsored publication... The ideas, news and thoughts posted are sourced… or written by the editor or contributors.

Can you help us? Here is how:

WRITE AND POST A BOOK REVIEW ONLINE:
Please know that if you write an honest book review, we are very very appreciative. Amazon, Kobo, Good Reads, Apple Books, etc. - every opinion counts.

DONATE COPIES:
If you can, please donate a copy of our book titles to your local library, college or school.

Search This Blog

You're Breaking Up: Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl #ICWA


CLICK:

[PDF] You're Breaking Up: The Faulty Connection Between Congressional Intent and Supreme Court Interpretation in Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, 133 S. Ct. 2552 (2013)

The chances of fully achieving these goals have been impeded by
the Supreme Court decision in Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl.9 
By holding that an Indian parent who never obtains custody of his child is
not privy to the protections offered by ICWA, the Supreme Court has
severely limited the Act’s application. Tribal security and stability are
hampered when Indian children are raised outside of the Native com-
munity because the opportunity to pass on tribal customs, traditions,
leadership and culture disappears.10 This Note begins by exploring
the historical facts leading to the passage of ICWA, its key provisions,
and its application. Part III discusses Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl
and the changes the Supreme Court has made to ICWA. Part IV con-
cludes by arguing how in an effort to do right, the majority of Supreme
Court Justices twisted ICWA to arrive at a conclusion the statute, if
read plainly, does not support.
You’re Breaking Up: The Faulty Connection Between Congressional Intent and Supreme Court Interpretation in Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, 133 S. Ct. 2552 (2013)
Danielle J. Larson

NEBRASKA LAW REVIEW: Current Issue: Volume 93, Issue 2 (2014) 

The irony of this, Byler commented, was apparent. “[T]ribes that
were forced onto reservations at gunpoint and prohibited from leaving without a
permit, are now being told that they live in a place unfit for raising their children.”
Id. at 20; see also Janet L. Wallace and Lisa R. Pruitt, Judging Parents,
Judging Place: Poverty, Rurality, and Termination of Parental Rights, 77 MO. L.
REV. 95 (arguing that while courts have stated poverty is an impermissible basis
for termination of parental rights, many make rural places a proxy for poverty
and terminate on that basis instead).

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please: Share your reaction, your thoughts, and your opinions. Be passionate, be unapologetic. Offensive remarks will not be published. We are getting more and more spam. Comments will be monitored.
Use the comment form at the bottom of this website which is private and sent direct to Trace.

Support them!

What our Nations are up against!

What our Nations are up against!

To Veronica Brown

Veronica, we adult adoptees are thinking of you today and every day. We will be here when you need us. Your journey in the adopted life has begun, nothing can revoke that now, the damage cannot be undone. Be courageous, you have what no adoptee before you has had; a strong group of adult adoptees who know your story, who are behind you and will always be so.

Did you know?

Did you know?
lakota.cc/16I9p4D

Help in available!

Help in available!
1-844-7NATIVE (click photo)

click to listen

Diane Tells His Name

where were you adopted?

where were you adopted?