How to Use this Blog
Howdy! We've amassed tons of information and important history on this blog since 2010. If you have a keyword, use the search box below. Also check out the reference section above. If you have a question or need help searching, use the contact form at the bottom of the blog.
We do not endorse Amazon. We prefer BOOKSHOP! (the editor will earn a small amount of money or commission. (we thank you) (that is our disclaimer statement)
This is a blog. It is not a peer-reviewed journal, not a sponsored publication... The ideas, news and thoughts posted are sourced… or written by the editor or contributors.
Can you help us? Here is how:
WRITE AND POST A BOOK REVIEW ONLINE:
Please know that if you write an honest book review, we are very very appreciative. Kobo, Good Reads, Apple Books, etc. - every opinion counts.
DONATE COPIES:
If you can, please donate a copy of our book titles to your local library, college or school.
I am devastated by the recent court ruling and hope Dusten still has a chance to keep his daughter. This case is beyond tragic. And for people who celebrate the outcome--they should take note that their own unwed sons and grandsons could someday suffer the loss of a child through adoption. This case impacts birth father rights in general too, and when birthfathers lose children, so do the rest of the natural family. What a nightmare.
ReplyDeleteWhile I love this statement, I do wish everyone would be very careful to refer to the Copabiancos as Veronica's potential or prospective adoptive parents. Those who are not familiar with adoption will assume that she had been adopted and that Mr. Brown practically stole her back. And that is far from the case. I don't mean to nitpick but I think this is an important distinction.
ReplyDeleteIndeed - and the Supreme Court made the mistake too!
DeleteThank you Robin and Jennifer for your comments - they are greatly appreciated!
ReplyDelete